TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum  

Go Back   TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum » Main Forum » Shouts

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-10, 01:07 AM
Benjamin's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SW Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,312
Default

Originally Posted by Zichao View Post
Although pretty soon they're going to have to change it to "Flirter"...
The 'Ghost who flirts' eh? Hmmm... Sounds like creepy fun maybe....
__________________
"Neither man nor nation can exist without a sublime idea."
Fyodor Dostoyevsky, 1821 - 1881
QOTD

My BLOG: Things Have Changed
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-10, 11:58 PM
Zichao's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,038
Default

More stuff about rationalism/anti-rationalism in the 19th century. So today I went to a little occult bookshop off the rue St Honoré looking for anything by Léo Taxil and especially Dr Bataille. One of their editions was too much for me but really beautiful, and they also had a Vie de Jésus which isn't really crucial for my stuff but so nice that I might go back and get it anyway. Anyhow, I came away with a copy of Eugen Weber's Satan Franc Maçon. The intro's so good and so relevant that I'm going to do a quick and dirty translation of a part.

Quote:
Spurned by the classical 17th century, rejected by the rationalist 18th century, Satan was destined for rehabilitation by the romantic and realist 19th century, whose realism was frequently merely a romatic posture. From Britain, Chateaubriand brought back, among other things, a miltonian view of this grandiose angel, fallen but undefeated, still claiming his right to paradise lost. With the miracles of the Church he would convince the French public of the prestige of a Devil more dynamic and more picturesque than all the saints. At the same time came a renewed interest in the "gothic" Middle Ages, filled with suggestive darkness, helping the cause of the personnage who played such an important part there. The romantics, fascinated by witchcraft and demonology, magic, mystery and fantasy, found them in books on the occult sciences and satanic secrets.

(...)

But there was also the heroic, promethean Devil, “supreme incarnation and individualist prototype,” in the words of Louis Maigron, “the first and greatest revolutionary”, a prototype defeated but free in thought for the Renés, Manfreds, Laras, Antonies and so many other romantic heroes, whom Baudelaire addressed in his litanies with:

Oh, most knowing and most beautiful of the angels
A god betrayed by fortune and deprived of worship…
Oh wronged prince in exile
And who, defeated, returns stronger than before…

Symbol of free thought for Gautier, the critical and analytical spirit for Flaubert, anti-dogmatic relativism for Renan, Satan was the ideal romantic hero (...) Thus Satan is not necessarily Evil, though this is also part of his role. Often he is merely the Other, an oponent of the established order, the received ideas, of conventional interests recommending themselves to God. And this opposition reminds us of another of Satan's incarnations, still that of the revolutionary hero but this time not merely in a litterary sense but also in a political one. If for the rulers of the Restoration, freedom was diabolical, then why shouldn't the liberals take the side of of the Devil?

(…)

If they didn’t, their enemies would do it for them (…) The denunciation of reason and modern ideas as diabolical machinations is not a new phenomenon either. Since the fall Satan has always symbolized knowledge, the idea that it is possible to control one’s environment oneself by thought, reason, speculation, invention and will, independently of God, his will and his authority. Incapable of conceiving of knowledge as a personal acquisition, the men of the Middle Ages, often encouraged by the Church, attributed it to demonic intervention. Dr Faustus, Roger Bacon and Pope Sylvester II were alleged to have signed contracts with the Devil, and it was to the latter that Pope Gregory XVI attributed the invention of the steam engine.

It is hardly surprising that men thirsty for science, hungry for beauty, revolted by the intolerance and the injustice of those who claimed to rule over them in the name of a good god, but apparently responsible for so many sins, should have joined the Devil’s party.

(…)

With this a new wave of fundamentalism overtook the Church: miracles, prophecies, relics, visions and pilgrimages were the popular aspect of the Church militant. “No witches, no Devil; no Devil, no God,” claimed John Wesley, someone who knew his subject.

(…)

It is also important to note the mysterious and incomprehensible nature of the world that science was beginning to reveal at the time. Humanity lived, it seemed, surrounded by invisible spells. “A flying spirit,” following the reasoning of Huysmans’ Durtal, “is not any more extraordinary than a microbe come from far away to poison you unexpectedly; the atmosphere could just as well house spirits as bacilli.” What was the difference between electricity and hypnotism or magnetism? No one was entirely sure. It was easy to assimilate them. A new sort of relativism and a new sort of eclecticism combined to create a new faith: Tertullian’s creed of impossibility. Trying to reason with abstractions and incomprehensible realities one would end by going insane. No one believed anything any more, so everyone was free to believe in everything. As the hero of Là-bas remarks, “since everything is defensible and nothing is certain, why not succubi? But then if succubi are fine then everything is fine: magic, black masses, darkness teeming with horrors and conspiracies, ritual murder…”
That last bit in French is “obscurité grouillante”. He might have had his little eccentricities, but fuck me the bloke could write.

It's a public service really (to which particular section of the public I'm not sure - Google savvy diabolists, presumably) because, partly due to a general lag, and partly due to Sarko's little snit about the theft of our cultural patrimony fuck all French books are available online, whereas practically everything on which the copyright has ever expired in English is up there somewhere. Bummer for me as most of what I need is French, but there you go. Afaik all of Taxil's work is currently out of print here, while Waite's debunking of the same in English is both in print and available online.

Weber's rather going on about the Prince of this World because, well, that's the subject of the book obviously, but for our purposes I'm more interested in his analysis of the cross-fertilisation of rationalism and romanticism, which, needless to say, is far better than anything I could do.
__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-10, 07:01 PM
Zichao's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,038
Default

Today I had a lot of random to buy, so I went to Bd Barbès, where there are lots of randomness shops. I got it all, but the trip also reminded me of the best shop ever, and they have a website.

If you can't read it, its a shop specialising in cosmetics, occult books, voodoo love potions and religious paraphernalia. Finally, I no longer have to shop around!
__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-10, 09:04 PM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,639
Default

Originally Posted by Zichao View Post
That last bit in French is “obscurité grouillante”. He might have had his little eccentricities, but fuck me the bloke could write.
Nice image indeed. You could worst than try H.P Lovecraft. The guy's a bit of a racist but, apart from that, his stuff (and some of the guys that took over his Mythos afterward aren't bad either. I quite like August Derleth's short stories).

H. P. Lovecraft - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Call of Cthulhu - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-10, 10:22 PM
Zichao's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,038
Default

Tit for tat: free download of Julian Osgood Field's decadent horror stories. Half way between Bram Stoker and Saki.
__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 12-02-10, 01:56 PM
Zichao's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,038
Default

Offensive genrealisation time: old eurocrats are sort of cynically enthusiastic in a nerdish sort of way (and frequently a bit drunk, I think), but the young ones all look and sound like junior members of a New Labour government. The more I have to do with them the less enthusiastic I am about a supranational EU.
__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 12-02-10, 03:09 PM
contracycle's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,150
Default

Seeing as Gilles asked what Cochrane had achieved, I thought I would post something, but it would seem more appropriate to hijack this thread for the purpose than the one it was raised in.

From the Wiki:

Quote:
Admiral Thomas Cochrane, 10th Earl of Dundonald, Marquess do Maranhão, GCB, ODM (Chile) (14 December 1775 – 31 October 1860), styled Lord Cochrane between 1778 and 1831,[1][2] was a senior British naval flag officer and radical politician. He was a daring and successful captain of the Napoleonic Wars, leading the French to nickname him 'Le Loup des Mers' ('The Sea Wolf' or 'The Wolf of the Seas'). He was dismissed from the Royal Navy in 1814, following a conviction for fraud on the Stock Exchange and he then served in the rebel navies of Chile, Brazil and Greece during their respective wars of independence. In 1832, he was reinstated in the Royal Navy with the rank of Rear Admiral of the Blue. After being promoted several times following his reinstatement, he died in 1860 with the rank of Admiral of the Red, and the honorary title of Rear-Admiral of the United Kingdom. His life and exploits served as inspiration for the naval fiction of nineteenth and twentieth-century novelists, particularly C. S. Forester's Horatio Hornblower and Patrick O'Brian's Jack Aubrey.
That nickname, incidentally, was bestowed by Napoleon.

Cochrane is one of those larger-tha-life characters whose exploits seem absurdly implausible. He was an excellent ships captain but was totally incapable of getting along with his superiors, and even his friends in the Radical party found him insufferably direct and undiplomatic. His political effect was limited, although he did have some success in his prime concern which was corruption in the navy, itself a major political issue of the day. But he was no orator, and at the time it was possible to be both an MP and an active military officer, so much of his term of office was spent at sea. Indeed, that was probably a big part of the motive behind becoming an MP in the first place, to make such a nuisance of himself on land that the Admiralty would give him a ship.

Cochrane was both personally brave and very careful with the lives of his crew, to the point that he was once denied a medal because he had sustained no casualties, and the Admiralty therefore concluded that it could not have been a hard fought action.

Quote:
One of his most notable exploits was the capture of the Spanish xebec frigate El Gamo, on 6 May 1801. El Gamo carried 32 guns and 319 men, compared with Speedy's 14 guns and 54 men.[7] Cochrane flew an American flag to approach so closely to El Gamo that its guns could not depress to fire on the Speedy's hull. This left the Spanish with no option but to board. However, whenever the Spanish were about to board, Cochrane would pull away briefly, and fire on the concentrated boarding parties with his ship's guns. Eventually, Cochrane boarded the Gamo, despite still being outnumbered about five to one, and captured her.
Some things that are not mentioned about this incident: the Speedy's guns were only 8-pounders, which could barely penetrate the hull the Gamo; and the ship was so structurally unsound that firing a full broadside risked damage. When they boarded, they left only the bosun aboard the Speedy, and once engaged Cochrane called down to him to send up a second wave, upon which the crew of the Gamo surrendered. They then put their prisoners in the hold and wrestled a couple of carronades to point down into the hatch so the minimal prize crew could sail her back to Britain.

Another incident typical of Cochrane was the attack on Rochefort. Cochrane was in disgrace at the time, while the port was blockaded by the fleet, and so he amused himself by constructing a plan for the use of fire-ships which he sent to the Admiralty. (Cochrane's father had been something of an inventor, and had probably invented a sort of poison gas, although it was never adopted.) None of the admirals of the fleet were willing to use fire-ships as they thought it dishonourable, so Cochrane was given the command (probably in the hope he'd get himself killed). Cochrane then improved on his own plan by constructing some "explosion ships", filled with tamped down gunpowder, shot, and grenades, to go in along with the fire-ships, and sailed one of these himself. When he and the small number of volunteers abandoned the explosion ship in a launch, they heard barking from the ship and rowed back to rescue the ships mascot dog. This probably saved his life because it put them inside the perimeter where most of the debris came down.

There are biographies of Cochrane that are well worth a read, and he always features in accounts of the British naval war of the period. A contemporary of his on the other side, Baron de Marbot, is also worth reading; he wrote a memoir, and while perhaps not quite as colourful as Cochrane he certainly lived an exciting life, being wounded on several occassions and at one point being paralyzed by the effect of a cannonball which struck his hat.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 12-02-10, 03:56 PM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,639
Default

Thanks for that. Interesting life indeed!

But he was fired for market manipulation and he was strongly anti-corruption... Hmmmm... I smell something a bit fishy here... Either he was wrongly fired on trump-up charges or he had a very sharp worldview whereby it's OK to be corrupt but not when you're talking about the Navy!

And, as a politician, he was basically inefficient. Still, it was a lovely trick on the voters and taking them down for a peg or two so I like him
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-10, 10:04 AM
insignificant data point
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,799
Default

Quote:
the emblem of the university is a fox and a lion
Fox and hedgehog would have been wiser choice.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-10, 10:17 AM
insignificant data point
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,799
Default

Quote:
Parisians are notoriously unpleasant so every actual incidence of unpleasantness seems to reinforce the eternal truth. In real terms I don't think they're worse than in London or Beijing, though Americans and Japanese probably get a bit of culture shock.
Not quite right.

In 1966 the International Bureau of Weights and Measures, which determines definition of the fundamental physical units of the universe (mass, time, velocity, that sort of stuff) passed a resolution naming the international unit of obnoxiousness the "parisien". It noted that the basic unit was too large for normal use and that most obnoxiousness measures would be expressed in milliparisiens (or even, in more engaging societies like New Zealand, in microparisiens).

Recently the scale has been extended with hecto- and kilo-parisiens to accommodate nations such as Burma and North Korea - nations where it was recently determined that officials are substantially more obnoxious than in France.
Reply With Quote
Reply


(View-All Members who have read this thread : 26
a-non-y-mouse, AnonymousIdiotSavant, at946, Benjamin, Catwoman, contracycle, Francois Cellier, FredFredson, Gilles de Rais, Iolo, Jayne B, kangkeklew, ktp, LiberalNation, Noir, otheloceach, parihaka, PostmodernProphet, psyche, raapc5, roadkill, sunityowillams, Zan de Man, Zichao
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0