TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum  

Go Back   TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum » Main Forum » The Principle of the Thing

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 25-05-11, 02:58 AM
FredFredson's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: North America
Posts: 1,749
Cool The right's mirror-image view of life

The right's mirror-image view of life


The right's mirror-image view of life - Opinion - Al Jazeera English

Anti-abortion campaigners believe it is their right to choose the rights of others - while many 'pro-lifers' vocally support the death penalty and wars that kill innocents [GALLO/GETTY]

Yesterday, I pulled up to a drive-through ATM, and sitting in front of me in the line was a car with a license plate that simply stated, "Choose Life".

Who can argue with that? I support life, don't you?

The problem, of course, is the relationship between that phrase and the US right wing. You know, the ones who are petrified of everything from black presidents to black helicopters to Black Sabbath.

Yes, they piously claim to be "pro-life", but it is a simple platitude, for - to paraphrase Inigo Montoya from The Princess Bride - I do not think that word means what they think it means.

To those not steeped in US politics, being pro-life might seem like it means what one would expect - to oppose policies and endeavours that duly result in a loss of human life. But, in the US political arena, it means something quite different. Generally, it is a way of telling everyone that it's your business to give a woman her marching orders - that she must eventually carry a three-day-old embryo to term, even if it's the result of rape or incest.

Or its corollary, that you're some kind of Nietzschean Superman for ensuring that 91-year-old patients in terrible pain due to pancreatic cancer must stick a tube in any empty orifice to force themselves to stay alive and suffer, even against their own wishes.

The sad reality is that, to be pro-life in the US today, which is to be conservative in almost all cases, is to love thy enemy by supporting illegal wars - or just plain stupid ones - that kill hundreds of thousands of innocents, cutting health-care benefits and nutrition programs for children and the poor, and turning the other cheek … of the person you're torturing.

It is also to cut funding for bridges that are falling down to make room for slashing the tax on yacht shoes, make a best faith effort to ensure criminals, the mentally unbalanced and terrorists have access to assault weapons and C4 explosives, and to love thy neighbour - to love them so much as to give him or her a lethal injection if you think they killed someone.

"Think" is the operative word here, as it seems the conservative Governor of Ohio, John Kasich, may be about to put an innocent man to death. Shawn Hawkins, the man in question, is to be executed on June 14, 2011. This, even though there are serious enough concerns he may be innocent that on May 11, the Ohio Parole Board unanimously recommended that the governor grant him clemency due to increasing doubt over his guilt.

But hell, what's a little faulty eyewitness testimony, evidence destroyed before it could be DNA tested, and lack of placing the defendant in possession of the murder weapon between friends?

So, in other words, the morning-after pill is murder, but taking a guy who even Ken Blackwell, Republican candidate for Governor in 2006, thinks should be given clemency - and killing him - that is just so pro-life!
The truth is that those on the US right are about as "pro-life" as Arnold Schwarzenegger is pro-wife. Or Dominique Strauss Kahn is pro-maid.

It is an empty phrase they throw around to attract a core demographic of foaming mouths, those who hate the very idea of a woman choosing to have sex and having any control over her body. Because presumably, Jesus, who talked about love and brotherhood, would have taken the time to stop walking on water and curing the infirm to publicly flog any woman contemplating a life of self-determination.

This is not to say there are not legitimate concerns with late-term abortions. I have these concerns. Or underage girls making this decision without adult guidance. I have those ones too.

But this is not what this particular battle's about. Because if it were, I probably wouldn't have once argued on a television show with a conservative, who in one sentence told me that abortion was murder, and in the next that we should eliminate the Environmental Protection Agency (the guys who, you know, make sure we can breathe) - and turn Iraq into a "glass factory" (See: sand and extreme heat).

Now maybe you're reading this and asking: "I already know all of this, why is he wasting my time?" Well, perhaps this is just my way of saying I'm tired of the platitudes, particularly on the licence plates of portly, pale, Rush Limbaugh-imbibers who take way-too-much time at the drive-through ATM because they're still working their way through fractions.

You can pick whatever political slogan you want. But pro-life is pro-life in any language. And you're probably a bit closer to actually being pro-life if you care about how a pregnant woman will get healthcare, and aren't the guy trying to cut it, while wearing your wife-beater t-shirt and holding up the Obama sign with the Hitler moustache.

Cliff Schecter is the President of Libertas, LLC, a progressive public relations firm, the author of the 2008 bestseller The Real McCain, and a regular contributor to The Huffington Post.
__________________
"Patriotism means being loyal to your country all the time and to its government when it deserves it."-- Mark Twain

"Inter arma silent Musae"--when the weapons speak, the muses fall silent.

An't nanum hearm deth, doth hwaet ye willath.

It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished
unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets. -Voltaire

Economic Left/Right: -3.88
Authoritarian/Libertarian: -4.36
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 25-05-11, 09:34 AM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,639
Default

Quote:
Now maybe you're reading this and asking: "I already know all of this, why is he wasting my time?"
Kind of what I thought. The right-wings will tell you that an embryo is innocent while a criminal already made his choice and need to assume consequences, while, obviously, wars serve national imperative purposes and that the Bible never said that you can't kill enemies or got to accept death at the hands of enemies... (Technically, you can quotes passages to that effect but you can also quotes slightly more realistic passages so it's a bit of a cherry-picking and "you don't understand what is really being said here").

Breaking into that logic is the interesting bit and is ultimately impossible because, as we know, people aren't moved by facts, logic or anything else.
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 25-05-11, 11:16 AM
PostmodernProphet's Avatar
full immersion.....
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,194
Default

how about the fact that since 1972 more deaths have been caused by abortion in the US alone than in all the wars of the world......
__________________
....attached to sanity by a bungee cord.....
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 25-05-11, 11:47 AM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,639
Default

Clearly, we need more wars...
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 25-05-11, 11:58 AM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,639
Default

That being said, I checked for fun & the abortion toll since 72 in the USA seems to be around 40-45 millions.

The death toll for wars across the 20th century seems to dwarve that - Just WWII death toll is given as lowest estimate 40 millions and highest 70 millions.

Obviously, comparing death toll is flawed logic but, in any case, abortions aren't the Armageddon you describe.

In any case, I always thought that the right way to go about it was to compare the number of abortions (bad) per fucking (good). As I said before, if you got a 300 million population with around 150 millions within the likely age group of having sex, then some unwanted pregnancies are going to be inevitable.

Your efforts should be weighted towards reducing that ratio so that people can keep fucking (good) but avoid abortions (bad)...
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 25-05-11, 09:31 PM
AnonymousIdiotSavant's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,089
Default

Originally Posted by Gilles de Rais View Post
Your efforts should be weighted towards reducing that ratio so that people can keep fucking (good) but avoid abortions (bad)...

Mmmm, gay marriage?
__________________
Righteousness will always be the trap at the gates of hell
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 26-05-11, 10:20 AM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,639
Default

Well, you do want children too and christians/conservatives have an issue with gays but otherwise, yes - More gay marriages will guarantee less abortions...
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 27-05-11, 07:15 PM
PostmodernProphet's Avatar
full immersion.....
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,194
Default

Originally Posted by Gilles de Rais View Post
The death toll for wars across the 20th century seems to dwarve that - Just WWII death toll is given as lowest estimate 40 millions and highest 70 millions.
well shucks....call me foolish.....I didn't even know WW2 had happened since 1972......
__________________
....attached to sanity by a bungee cord.....
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 29-05-11, 11:00 AM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,639
Default

Your phrasing was unclear, if I may say. Any comments on my ratio approach, though? I mean, even married Christians fuck from time to time, no? And so a % of this will translate in unwanted pregnancies, yes?
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 29-05-11, 11:49 PM
PostmodernProphet's Avatar
full immersion.....
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,194
Default

Originally Posted by Gilles de Rais View Post
Your phrasing was unclear, if I may say. Any comments on my ratio approach, though? I mean, even married Christians fuck from time to time, no? And so a % of this will translate in unwanted pregnancies, yes?
so, is it your claim that the number of abortions per Gross National Ejaculations is actually at it's lowest level since WW2?......
__________________
....attached to sanity by a bungee cord.....
Reply With Quote
Reply


(View-All Members who have read this thread : 8
AnonymousIdiotSavant, contracycle, FredFredson, Gilles de Rais, LiberalNation, P.I., PostmodernProphet, Zichao
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0