TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum  

Go Back   TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum » Main Forum » The Principle of the Thing

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-12-11, 10:45 AM
contracycle's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,150
Default Allowing Women To Drive Would Mean No More Virgins

Allowing Women To Drive Would Mean No More Virgins, Saudi Arabia Religious Council Says


Huffington Post UK Felicity Morse First Posted: 2/12/11 18:01 GMT Updated: 2/12/11 18:01 GMT


Allowing women to drive in Saudi Arabia would mean no more virgins and an increase in homosexuality, according to academics at Saudi Arabia’s highest religious council, Majlis al-Ifta' al-A'ala, it has been reported in the Telegraph.

More pornography would be used if women were allowed on the roads and rates of prostitution and divorce would alo rise, the report stated.

Produced in conjunction with Kamal Subhi, a former professor at the King Fahd University, the study into repealing the ban predicted that there would be no more virgins left in the Arab kingdom in 10 years.

Saudi Arabia is the only country in the world which bans women from driving.

Professor Subhi described sitting in a coffee shop in an unnamed Arab state where “all the women were looking at me“.

“One made a gesture that made it clear that she was available,” he said. “This is what happens when women are allowed to drive.”

The report was produced for the country's legislative assembly, the Shura Council. However this institution has no power as Saudi Arabia is ruled by a monarchy with absolute power.

The state’s controversial ban on female drivers last came under attack in September after Shaima Jastaniya was sentenced to 10 lashes just days after Saudi King Abdullah granted women the right to vote. The punishment was overturned after international and domestic pressure.

Saudi Arabia is currently considering a law for women to cover up their eyes if they are deemed too "tempting."

Allowing Women To Drive Would Mean No More Virgins, Saudi Arabia Religious Council Says
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-12-11, 11:02 AM
AnonymousIdiotSavant's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,089
Default

I believe it. It is after all how I lost my first girlfriend.

Had a low speed accident at an intersection that caused her to slip onto the car's stick shift, after which she decided she no longer had any use for me.
__________________
Righteousness will always be the trap at the gates of hell
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-12-11, 11:44 AM
LiberalNation's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: KY, USA
Posts: 1,199
Default

Lol
__________________
Give unto Caesar that what is Caesar's, and lie like hell to keep as much of the rest of your shit as you can.

"If you want something said ask a man...if you want something done, ask a woman" Margaret Thatcher
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-11, 11:31 AM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,639
Default

That's the future facing Saudi Arabia...



----------------------------------------

Professor Subhi described sitting in a coffee shop in an unnamed Arab state where “all the women were looking at me“. “One made a gesture that made it clear that she was available,” he said. “This is what happens when women are allowed to drive.”

Delusional mythomaniac? Delusional mythomaniac.

... unless he is the Arab Johnny Depp....
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-11, 11:38 AM
Catwoman's Avatar
Cat Ninja
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 101
Default

They were prolly just staring at the bogie lodged in his beard.
__________________
“Some people like the Jews, and some do not. But no thoughtful man can deny the fact that they are, beyond any question, the most formidable and the most remarkable race which has appeared in the world.”

- Winston Churchill - Prime Minister of Great Britain
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-12-11, 07:32 PM
Zichao's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,038
Default

Quote:
Women driving has been a controversial issue in Saudi Arabia since 1990 when 47 women got into 14 cars and drove on to a main street in Riyadh. They were stopped, suspended from work for two years and condemned for years in religious sermons and social circles. The last public assault was when Sheikh Mohammed Al Arefe in 2003 objected to the fact that these women were allowed to go back to teaching because he was worried that they would encourage their students to follow in their footsteps.

It took more than 15 years for another group of women to gather the courage to start a public movement against the ban on female driving. Since 2006, every few months there would be a study, petition, video or campaign but to no avail. This is no surprise, because there are just as many studies, videos, petitions and campaigns calling on the government to maintain the ban.

Professor Kamal al-Subhi has written the most recent of these studies. Subhi is an American-educated retired professor who took it upon himself to prepare a scientific study on the effects of women driving on society. The study is based on unstructured direct interviews methodology, in which he visited two unnamed Arabian Gulf countries and a third unnamed North African country to ask people about the effects of women driving.

Strangely, all the people he asked were unanimously against women driving and felt that one way or another it was the reason behind their societies' woes. Subhi categorised their replies into eight main comments, all of which were negative and misogynistic. One such comment: "Girls are the key to immorality. It will ensue if they are given unrestricted freedom because of their small mindedness or if they face a problem."

He also makes his own observations on these neighbouring societies:


"After a while, a woman got up and walked to her car in the parking lot in front of the Starbucks we were in. She shouted at the Indian cleaning her car for not doing a good job of it. She was wearing a pair of pants so tight that her innermost organs were discernible.

"Despite that, she put her hands on her knees and bowed down to point at a lower part of the car that the Indian had missed. The young men at the cafe were attentively watching through the glass this undoubtedly arousing scene. The whole place was indecent and smelt of moral disintegration."

Subhi refers to a study a fellow researcher told him about that was conducted by Unesco that linked women driving to adultery, divorce, rape and illegitimate children. He does remark, though, that he has not seen this study for himself.

Subhi wrote this 16-page study for a like-minded online group of influential intellectuals and writers. A third party felt it was worthy of a national audience and so took it to the Shura Council, a government-appointed advisory body made up of 150 members. At the Shura Council, the study was not only received but a Shura member also personally endorsed it. It was later leaked to women's rights activists who scanned a copy and posted it for the whole world to see.

The overwhelming majority of Saudis online were not only offended but also embarrassed that a Saudi so-called successful intellectual would write so lowly of women from neighbouring countries. There were also many remarks asking how the Shura Council members could have their time wasted by being given this type of study for consideration.

Subhi has issued a statement through the same online group in objection to the international ridicule that he and his study have been subjected to.

In this statement he writes that he knows the west, and his study follows international scientific standards no one can refute. He claims that he is so greatly respected by his western counterparts that they offered him citizenship. The problem with the international press report, he says, is that it was commissioned by a Saudi hater who used a miserable reporter to write a piece that unfairly summed up his 16-page paper into half a page.

In this follow-up statement he addresses Saudi royal princesses and advises them to not make statements to the international media on advancing women's rights within the country. This is a thinly veiled criticism of many princesses who have done just that in the past such as Princess Adelah, Princess Basma bint Saud, Princess Amira Al Taweel and Princess Loloah Al Faisal. These royal family members have all advocated lifting the ban on women driving.

Finally, he warns that we as Saudis have to tread carefully and slowly when it comes to women's rights because one thing might lead to another, until homosexuals start demanding and getting rights.
The Saudi 'study' that finds all women drivers on the road to immorality | Eman Al Nafjan | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk

"Innermost organs"? Eewwwww.
__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.
Reply With Quote
Reply


(View-All Members who have read this thread : 6
AnonymousIdiotSavant, Catwoman, contracycle, Gilles de Rais, LiberalNation, Zichao
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0