TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum  

Go Back   TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum » Main Forum » Polls

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 14-11-09, 10:45 AM
insignificant data point
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,799
Default Should Godwin's law be extended: first person who cites Fox News loses the argument?

Godwin's Law, dating back to 1990 when Usenet discussion groups were a precursor of what the World Wide Web was to become, stated that, "As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1."

A corollary, which Godwin personally approved, was that "in many newsgroups and other Internet discussion forums that once such a comparison is made, the thread is finished and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically 'lost' whatever debate was in progress."

It is now 65 years since the Nazis were defeated and such analogies have lost their force, but such a force is still required. Therefore I nominate the citing of Fox News as being the 21st century equivalent of Godwin's 20th century Nazis. I am not suggesting that Fox and Nazis are anything alike except in the respect that Fox fits well into the corollary of Godwin's law mentioned above:

Once a citation from Fox News is used to support a position, the thread is finished and whoever mentioned Fox has automatically lost.

Opinions?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 14-11-09, 10:58 AM
psyche's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: London
Posts: 1,575
Default

Originally Posted by roadkill View Post
I am not suggesting that Fox and Nazis are anything alike
you're not? what a shame.

how might one make an argument that fox and the nazis *were* alike, without being doubly skewered by godwin? hmm.
__________________
The New Topical: current affairs, current events, politics, political, culture, cultural, ethics & economics discussion debate forum.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 14-11-09, 12:07 PM
insignificant data point
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,799
Default

Psyche,

I thought I rather finessed that, subtly leaving readers with the distinct impression that they are.

If I failed, you are welcome to suggest an improvement.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 14-11-09, 12:32 PM
psyche's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: London
Posts: 1,575
Default

i double bluffed you darling
__________________
The New Topical: current affairs, current events, politics, political, culture, cultural, ethics & economics discussion debate forum.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 27-03-11, 07:59 PM
Junior Member
 

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: England
Posts: 10
Default

Well, Fox News (often known as Faux News) is not exactly the best representative of the US media any more than Sky News is of the British media.

As I regard Godwin's Law as not a law but just a piece of prejudiced posturing by people who don't want to fes up to what the Nazis or their sympathisers did or advocate today I can't see the point in extending a bad law to make another bad one!

(Maybe I should post my poem on the porajmos!?
Reply With Quote
Reply


(View-All Members who have read this thread : 11
a-non-y-mouse, AnonymousIdiotSavant, Catwoman, contracycle, FredFredson, Gilles de Rais, ladylinda, Moniker, psyche, roadkill, Zichao
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0