Out with the old politics

Ed Miliband's pitiful offer of 1p membership won't tempt the young back to parliamentary politics


o Laurie Penny
o The Guardian, Friday 24 December 2010

Democracy is going cheap. Just in time for the January sales, the party responsible for introducing tuition fees has decided that it wants to jump on the youth protest bandwagon. "Join the party for one penny, and we will be your voice," writes Ed Miliband in a rather desperate Christmas message to under-25s.

Labour is making a fundamental error, however, in assuming that these young protesters want or need anybody to "be our voice". Parliamentary politics has sold the young out, and whatever bargain-basement price tag mainstream parties slap on their membership, they aren't buying it any more.

The young people of Britain do not need leaders, and the new wave of activists has no interest in the ideological bureaucracy of the old left. Their energy and creativity is disseminated via networks rather than organisations, and many young people have neither the time nor the inclination to wait for any political party to decide what direction they should take. The Liberal Democrats represented the last hope that parliamentary democracy might have something to offer the young, and that hope has been exquisitely betrayed – no wonder, then, that the new movements have responded by rejecting the old order entirely.

What we are seeing here is no less than a fundamental reimagining of the British left: an organic reworking which rejects the old deferential structures of union-led action and interminable infighting among indistinguishable splinter parties for something far more inclusive and fast-moving. These new groups are principled and theoretically well-versed, but have no truck with the narcissism of small differences that used to corrupt even the most well-meaning of leftwing movements.

At the student meetings I have attended in recent weeks, ideological bickering is routinely sidelined in favour of practical planning. Anarchists and social democrats are obliged to work together alongside school pupils who don't care what flag you march under as long as you're on the side that puts people before profit. When the Unite leader, Len McLuskey, wrote in these pages this week encouraging union members to lend their support to the "magnificent student movement", he hit precisely the right note – one that respects the energy of these new networks of resistance without seeking to hijack it. The unions have begun to realise what the Labour party is still too arrogant to consider – that the nature of the fight against bigotry and greed has evolved beyond the traditional hierarchies of the left.

It is highly significant that one of the first things this hydra-headed youth movement set out to achieve was the decapitation of its own official leadership. When Aaron Porter of the National Union of Students was seen to be "dithering" over whether or not to support the protests, there were immediate calls for his resignation – and in subsequent weeks the NUS has proved itself worse than irrelevant as an organising force for demonstrations.

Of course, the old left is not about to disappear completely. It is highly likely that even after a nuclear attack, the only remaining life-forms will be cockroaches and sour-faced vendors of the Socialist Worker. Stunningly, the paper is still being peddled at every demonstration to young cyber-activists for whom the very concept of a newspaper is almost as outdated as the notion of ideological unity as a basis for action.

For these young protesters, the strategic factionalism of the old left is irrelevant. Creative, courageous and inspired by situationism and guerrilla tactics, they have a principled understanding of solidarity. For example, assembling fancy-dress flash mobs in Topshop to protest against corporate tax avoidance may seem frivolous, but this movement is daring to do what no union or political party has yet contemplated – directly challenging the banks and business owners who caused this crisis.

The young people of Britain are no longer prepared to take orders, and are unlikely to pay even a penny for a vacillating, pro-business party to be "our voice". We have never spoken in just one voice. We speak in hundreds of thousands of voices – voices that are being raised across Europe, not in unison but in harmony. The writing on the wall of the Treasury earlier this month may yet prove prescient: this is just the beginning.

Out with the old politics | Laurie Penny | Comment is free | The Guardian

While being mostly in favour of the sentiment, I'm strill gonna have to say "same as it ever was".

Quote:

Their energy and creativity is disseminated via networks rather than organisations,

And what exactly is that you think those organisations were, if not a network?

Quote:

an organic reworking which rejects...interminable infighting among indistinguishable splinter parties for something far more inclusive and fast-moving.

Only to be followed by...

Quote:

It is highly significant that one of the first things this hydra-headed youth movement set out to achieve was the decapitation of its own official leadership.

So, in fact, one of the first acts of this "new" movement was infighting.

Quote:

Stunningly, the paper is still being peddled at every demonstration to young cyber-activists for whom the very concept of a newspaper is almost as outdated as the notion of ideological unity as a basis for action.

It presumably has yet to dawn on these cyber-activists that the cybernetic tools they use - mobile phones and facebook etc. - are all owned and controlled by the corporations they wish, or need, to confront; while the paper is independently owned and run.

So, while I appreciate the enthusiasm, when the rubber meets the road, the hard-wone lessons of Leftist activism are still pertinent and and relevant, and the student movement is going to have to learn them, one way or the other.

Oh and on another note: the 1p offer is pretty grotesque. Yes it may seem as oif the Labour Party is reaching out and lowering the barriers to entry, but in fact this will just make the 1p members irrelevant as funders of the party. The LP still gets the bulk of its funding from member subs and union contributions, and although, under the Blairites, this did not imply control over policy by grassroots organs within the party, at least the priciple could be argued that the party was explicitly there to function, as Miliband puts it, as the voice or ordinary people. The 1p membership offer is purely tokenistic, and the party heirarchy will feel totally free to ignore whatever 1p members have to say, seeing as their contribution to the part is so minimal.

For once, I totally agree with "what you say".

As with sex. Every generation thinks they're the first one to discover it... And, of course, the very point of a teenage crisis is to reject your parents and their ideas... before basically becoming just like them...

"energy and creativity"? What? Protesting a tripling of a fee that affects you is particularly creative? I guess that the rich complaining at the possible repelling of the Bush Taxes were also 'energic and creative' then? Or were they 'selfish and retrograd'?

I guess it all depends where your a-prioris lie... Bloody emotive, useless journalism - and with an anti-ageism twist to top it off... "Fuck Miliband and its New Labour. It's passe. The Youth has the solution(s)". "Errr, sure, whatever you say but, you know, we really just don't want to pay triple the price for the same education in an environment where diplomas aren't even solid guarantees for a cushy but interesting professional job anymore."...

__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.

Yeah, it's like the soixante-huitards. They were totally unified when they were smashing shit. When they were sitting around Nanterre smoking weed and calling each other filthy maoist revisionists, not so much.

__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.