TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum  

Go Back   TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum » Main Forum » Politics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-10, 12:53 PM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,639
Default U.S. Voters Grab Beers, Pop Emergency Chute

U.S. Voters Grab Beers, Pop Emergency Chute: Margaret Carlson - Bloomberg

U.S. Voters Grab Beers, Pop Emergency Chute
By Margaret Carlson - Nov 3, 2010

The message is loud and clear, if not cogent or consistent. The Category 4 hurricane hit as predicted on Election Day and never let up. It’s hard to remember when so many politicians have been blown away at once.

Few of the losers could have been surprised. No members of Congress seeking re-election had publicly put their houses on the market, although a few real-estate agents told me they fielded calls.

The storm proved the anti-incumbent, anti-establishment fervor was real, deep and lasting. It ended up benefiting Republicans not because they offered any great promise or confidence-inspiring record, but simply because they are the party out of power. The closest thing to a primal scream this year was casting votes against Democrats.

American voters became Steven Slater, the JetBlue flight attendant.

Slater, you’ll recall, became insta-famous when he cursed out a passenger over the intercom system at the end of a flight, popped the emergency chute, grabbed some beers from the galley and slid to freedom. In kissing his job goodbye, he stuck it to The Man -- or so it must have seemed to the thousands of Facebook users who swiftly signed up as “fans.”

For a few weeks there, Slater probably could have started a career in elective politics, appealing to all those voters fed up with the system.

Closer Look

As time went on, it became clear that Slater was at least as much to blame as the passenger he said had set him off. By the time he pleaded guilty to attempted criminal mischief, the bloom was off the rose.

In that, too, Slater seemed to embody U.S. politics in 2010. The Tea Party movement succeeded in turning several little-known local politicians into national stars, at least until voters got a closer look.

Just as Slater faltered under examination, so did Christine O’Donnell, the not-a-witch, anti-masturbation Delaware Republican whose primary victory hijacked her party’s great chance at picking up Vice President Joe Biden’s old Senate seat. Even Karl Rove had a hard time accepting her. She lost last night, big.

Rand Paul was luckier. The newly elected senator from Kentucky, who last night celebrated the “Tea Party tidal wave,” withstood the revelations about his unconventional views, notably his odd sense that hard-won civil-rights laws in the 1960s somehow overreached by intruding on private business’s right to discriminate. Perhaps he can grab a seat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, which would give him a chance to elaborate.

Strange Bedfellows

The anomaly of election 2010 is how the Tea Party, full of voters who lost jobs in the economic collapse and are trying to rework mortgages the bank can’t find the paperwork for, aligned itself with the party that will add $3 trillion to the federal debt over 10 years to keep tax cuts for the wealthy, without specific offsetting spending cuts to speak of.

Yet the big winners in this Year of the Tea Party include Senator-elect Pat Toomey, Republican of Pennsylvania, a fiscal elitist of the first order who believes if the folks at the top get theirs, others will get theirs eventually -- leaving out the part that eventually we’ll all be dead.

And the biggest winner is, of all people, John Boehner, the Ohio Republican who will be the next speaker of the House.

Bank Bailout

Remember how Utah Senator Robert Bennett got cut down by the Tea Party movement at his party’s convention last spring, ostensibly for voting for the bank-bailout program known as TARP? That was a milestone moment in the Republican Party’s transformation into the anti-bailouts-for-banks party, even though the bailout was approved under a Republican president, George W. Bush.

Yes, Bennett voted for TARP in 2008. But so did Boehner. More than that, Boehner pleaded with his Republican colleagues on the House floor to join him, warning the U.S. was on the “brink of an economic disaster” and declaring it time to “look into our souls.”

Thank goodness for the John Boehner of 2008, for outgoing Senator Bennett, and for others who cast that difficult vote. It’s little consolation to Democrats today, but their unpopular actions -- including TARP and the deficit-widening economic stimulus -- saved the U.S. economy. Perhaps only Clarence from “It’s a Wonderful Life” could have helped President Barack Obama, showing voters how much worse things could have been without him.

Capital’s Lure

In the end, Obama and Democrats weren’t able to carry out their promised change in Washington quickly enough. Perhaps this new group may actually be the ones to change the capital; if history is a guide, the capital will change them.

Aides will whisper in their ears; their cars will purr at the curb. To kick-start their re-election fund-raising machine immediately, they’ll have to turn to the lobbyists of K Street, which will serve their roast beef rare and their martinis dry.

They’ll find that cozying up to Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell pays dividends -- good committee assignments, a close-in parking space -- that you can’t get by hanging out with the guy who brung them: backbench Senator Jim DeMint.

Come to think of it, I don’t think I heard any of these supposed outsiders promise term limits.

(Margaret Carlson, author of “Anyone Can Grow Up: How George Bush and I Made It to the White House” and former White House correspondent for Time magazine, is a Bloomberg News columnist. The opinions expressed are her own.)

To contact the writer of this column: Margaret Carlson in Washington at mcarlson3@bloomberg.net

------------------------------------------------------------------------

So people want "change". Don't they always? First, they voted in Obama for "change" - Saying (seemingly), hey, you know what, we want a more inclusive society. Now, they're voting for 'change' again but this time saying 'hey, you know what, enough of this socialist european bullcrap, give us good ol' fashioned American freedom to fail'...

Dunno. Apart from people being angry and mad, it's hard to make sense of what they really want or think... Well, who am I kidding? Probably they don't think...
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-10, 01:27 PM
Zichao's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,038
Default

If Obama had just said "my way or the highway" he'd probably still have a decent level of support, even if the reforms had been blocked there's a good chance that the public reaction would have been "Well we've just got to vote out all the obstructionists".

Big tent politics is great for electioneering, but once your guy's actually in office you want to see him kicking ass and taking names, not flapping about trying to compromise with everyone.
__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-10, 02:37 PM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,639
Default

Well, at least, I still would respect him more...
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-10, 04:36 PM
PostmodernProphet's Avatar
full immersion.....
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,194
Default

Originally Posted by Zichao View Post
If Obama had just said "my way or the highway" he'd probably still have a decent level of support, even if the reforms had been blocked there's a good chance that the public reaction would have been "Well we've just got to vote out all the obstructionists".

Big tent politics is great for electioneering, but once your guy's actually in office you want to see him kicking ass and taking names, not flapping about trying to compromise with everyone.
???....you saw Obama trying to compromise?......is "we won, get over it" a new code word for compromise?......
__________________
....attached to sanity by a bungee cord.....
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-11-10, 12:05 PM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,639
Default

Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
???....you saw Obama trying to compromise?...
The Obama admin has, so far, two set piece legislations: ObamaCare and the Dodd-Frank financial regulation one. How much of these correspond to undiluted Obama's vision vs. a compromise with Republican ideology?
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-11-10, 12:15 PM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,639
Default

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/05/us...tml?nl=&emc=a1

Tea Party Flexes Muscle with Republicans

By CARL HULSE and DAVID M. HERSZENHORN
Published: November 4, 2010

WASHINGTON — The incoming leadership of the new House Republican majority hardly had a chance to relish its dismantling of the Democrats before the Tea Party came calling in the form of Representative Michele Bachmann.

Ms. Bachmann, the Minnesota Republican and Tea Party heroine often seen exhorting conservative activists at rallies and on cable television, announced that she intended to seek the No. 4 position among House Republicans.

She said she could provide the viewpoint of a constitutional conservative, one she evidently sees lacking in Representatives John A. Boehner of Ohio, Eric Cantor of Virginia and Kevin McCarthy of California — the three likely leaders.

Mr. Cantor and other influential Republicans are rallying instead behind Representative Jeb Hensarling of Texas, a fiscal conservative, and Ms. Bachmann has only an outside shot at winning the race.

But her candidacy vividly illustrates the central tension facing Mr. Boehner and his team: balancing the demands of new lawmakers, some of whom ran against the Republican establishment and advocate a no-compromise stance toward the Obama administration and Democratic policies, against the need to deliver some accomplishments at a time of economic distress.

Ms. Bachmann is by no means the only Tea Party voice moving to exert influence over the new Congress.

In a draft of a confidential memo to be distributed to all incoming House Republican lawmakers, Dick Armey, a former Republican majority leader who is chairman of the conservative group FreedomWorks, and Matt Kibbe, its president, told lawmakers that a repeal of the Democrats’ health care law was “nonnegotiable” and warned that they would face a severe backlash from voters if they did not succeed in reversing the law.

“Politically speaking, your only choice is to get on offense and start moving boldly ahead to repeal, replace and defund Obamacare in 2011, or risk rejection by the voters in 2012,” Mr. Armey and Mr. Kibbe wrote.

House Republicans said they recognized the inherent conflicts, and the pressure that they would be under from the new majority-makers. But they also said they believed they could meet the challenge, given that veteran Republicans shared many of the newcomers’ goals.

When asked how the leadership planned to educate new members, particularly those who had never served in government, Representative Greg Walden of Oregon said, “My guess is these incoming freshmen are going to be giving us the training session.”

Mr. Walden, who is leading the Republican transition effort for the new majority, added: “They are coming with that energy, to bring that skill set and what they have heard in the heartland. They are going to be telling us.”


Flush with victory, top House Republicans and strategists said they saw little distinction between incumbent members and those who would be joining them as freshmen. They noted that both benefited from the Tea Party activism that helped them trounce Democrats and said that the support deserved to be rewarded.

“We are who we said we are, and we are ready to do what we said we would do,” said Brad Dayspring, a spokesman for Mr. Cantor. “We need to produce results for the people who spoke out so loudly on Tuesday.”

Mr. Boehner, the presumptive House speaker, has political views that make him attractive to Tea Party followers even though he has been in the House since 1991 and hardly qualifies as an outsider.

He has long opposed providing money for the home-state projects known as earmarks, even as his fellow Republicans have feasted on them, and he entered Congress as a rabble-rouser himself. He courted the Tea Party heavily during the campaign and has made repealing the health care law a priority.

Even as he and his fellow Republicans tried to chart a path forward, Mr. Boehner said Thursday that he was seeing signs that President Obama and Congressional Democrats failed to realize that Republican gains in Congress resulted from a potent backlash against the Democratic agenda.

“There seems to be some denial on the part of the president and other Democratic leaders of the message that was sent by the American people,” Mr. Boehner said in an interview with ABC News. “When you have the most historic election in over 60, 70 years, you would think the other party would understand that the American people have clearly repudiated the policies they’ve put forward in the last few years.”

Given the chance in the interview to agree with Senator Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader in the Senate, that the party’s goal should be to make Mr. Obama a one-term president, Mr. Boehner responded only that this was Mr. McConnell’s opinion, suggesting that Mr. Boehner was interested in staying out of that particular fight right now.

While the leadership team sees a chance to meld the Tea Party view into the House Republican ideology, there are bound to be conflicts. As the party now controlling the House, Republicans have to produce a budget, spending bills and other legislation that the 40 or so new lawmakers strongly allied to the Tea Party might balk at supporting, leaving the leadership scrambling for votes. Over all, there are at least 80 incoming Republican freshman, and the party is expected to control at least 239 seats. A vote next year on increasing the debt limit — an increase many Tea Party candidates could reject as a fundamental matter of principle — looms as a real test case.

And with the newly energized movement promising to watch closely, the incoming lawmakers will be very leery of seeming to be co-opted by the Congressional establishment, even if it is the leadership of their own party.

Ms. Bachmann’s candidacy suggests that while Republican leaders may face pressure from their Tea Party caucus, it could be manageable. Mr. Hensarling, while not as closely associated with the movement as Ms. Bachmann, is a popular lawmaker who headed the Republican Study Committee, a group of more than 100 conservatives. He has received praise from Tea Party leaders and Republican activists along with his leadership endorsements.

It is not clear if Ms. Bachmann can rally the incoming lawmakers to her side, though she has already won a few public supporters, including Representative John Kline, a fellow Minnesotan, and Representative Steve King, a conservative ally from Iowa.

Mr. Walden predicted that House Republicans would ultimately be able to band together.

“Remember, all of us just stood for election, all of us just faced the same voters in our own states,” he said. “All of us are coming back here understanding that voters want this place to change, and in a meaningful way.”

----------------------------------------

1- How touchingly modest, you wonderful hypocrit fuck.

2- Wow. After seeing the election of a (half) black man to the White House with a solid majority vote, it takes guts to qualify your own election of the historical one...

3- Where did I hear that before? Oh yes. The 2008 Presidential Election...
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
Reply


(View-All Members who have read this thread : 5
Benjamin, contracycle, Gilles de Rais, PostmodernProphet, Zichao
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0