TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum  

Go Back   TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum » Main Forum » Politics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 27-10-10, 04:55 AM
FredFredson's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: North America
Posts: 1,749
Default The Tea Parties didn’t arise spontaneously: they were boiled up by big business.


The Tea Parties didn’t arise spontaneously: they were boiled up by big business.


By George Monbiot. Published in the Guardian 26th October 2010

Monbiot.com Toxic Brew

The Tea Party movement is remarkable in two respects. It is one of the biggest exercises in false consciousness the world has ever seen. And it is the biggest astroturf operation in history. These accomplishments are closely related.

An astroturf campaign is a fake grassroots movement: it purports to be a spontaneous uprising of concerned citizens, but in reality it is founded and funded by elite interests. Some astroturf campaigns have no grassroots component at all(1). Others catalyse and direct real mobilisations. The Tea Party movement belongs in the second category. It is mostly composed of passionate, well-meaning people who think they are fighting elite power, and who are unaware that they’ve been organised by the very interests they believe they are confronting. We now have powerful evidence that the movement was established and has been guided with the help of money from billionaires and big business. Much of this money, as well as much of the strategy and staffing, were provided by two brothers who run what they call “the biggest company you’ve never heard of.”(2)

Charles and David Koch own 84% of Koch Industries, which is the second-largest private company in the United States. It runs oil refineries, coal suppliers, chemical plants and logging firms. It turns over roughly $100bn a year, and the brothers are each worth $21bn(3). The company has had to pay tens of millions of dollars in fines and settlements for oil and chemical spills and other industrial accidents(4,5). The Kochs want to pay less tax, keep more profits and be restrained by less regulation. Their challenge has been to persuade the people harmed by this agenda that it’s good for them.

In July 2010, David Koch told New York magazine, “I’ve never been to a Tea Party event. No one representing the Tea Party has ever even approached me.”(6) But a new fascinating film, (Astro)Turf Wars, by Taki Oldham, tells a fuller story(7). Oldham infiltrated some of the movement’s key organising events, including the 2009 Defending the Dream summit, convened by a group called Americans for Prosperity. The film shows David Koch addressing the summit. “Five years ago,” he explains, “my brother Charles and I provided the funds to start Americans for Prosperity. It’s beyond my wildest dreams how AFP has grown into this enormous organisation.”

A convenor tells the crowd how AFP mobilised opposition to Barack Obama’s healthcare reforms. “We hit the button and we started doing the Twittering and Facebook and the phonecalls and the emails, and you turned up!” Then a series of AFP organisers tell Mr Koch how they have set up dozens of Tea Party events in their home states. He nods and beams from the podium like a chief executive receiving rosy reports from his regional sales directors. Afterwards, the delegates crowd into AFP workshops, where they are told how to run further Tea Party events(8).

Americans for Prosperity is one of several groups set up by the Kochs to promote their politics. We know their foundations have given it at least $5m(9), but few such records are in the public domain and the total could be much higher. It has toured the country organising rallies against healthcare reform and the Democrats’ attempts to tackle climate change. It provided the key organising tools which set the Tea Party movement running. The movement began when the CNBC reporter Rick Santelli called from the floor of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange for a bankers’ revolt against the undeserving poor(10). (He proposed that the traders should hold a tea party to dump derivative securities in Lake Michigan to prevent Obama’s plan to “subsidise the losers”: by which he meant people whose mortgages had fallen into arrears). On the same day, Americans for Prosperity set up a Tea Party Facebook page and started organising Tea Party events(11).

Oldham’s film shows how AFP crafted the movement’s messages and drafted its talking points. The New Yorker magazine, in the course of a remarkable exposure of the Koch brothers’ funding networks, interviewed some of their former consultants(12). “The Koch brothers gave the money that founded [the Tea Party]”, one of them explained. “It’s like they put the seeds in the ground. Then the rainstorm comes, and the frogs come out of the mud - and they’re our candidates!” Another observed that the Kochs are smart. “This right-wing, redneck stuff works for them. They see this as a way to get things done without getting dirty themselves.”

The AFP is one of several groups established by the Koch brothers. They set up the Cato Institute, which was the first free market thinktank in the US. They also founded the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, which now fills the role once played by the economics department at Chicago University: as the originator of extreme neoliberal ideas(13,14). Fourteen of the 23 regulations that George W. Bush put on his hitlist were, according to the Wall Street Journal, first suggested by academics working at the Mercatus Center(15).

The Kochs have lavished money on more than 30 other advocacy groups, including the Heritage Foundation, the Manhattan Institute, the George C. Marshall Institute, the Reason Foundation and the American Enterprise Institute(16). These bodies have been instrumental in turning politicians away from environmental laws, social spending, taxing the rich and distributing wealth. They have shaped the widespread demand for small government. The Kochs ensure that their money works for them. “If we’re going to give a lot of money,” David Koch explained to a libertarian journalist, “we’ll make darn sure they spend it in a way that goes along with our intent. And if they make a wrong turn and start doing things we don’t agree with, we withdraw funding.”(17)

Most of these bodies call themselves “free market thinktanks”, but their trick, as (Astro)Turf Wars points out, is to conflate crony capitalism with free enterprise, and free enterprise with personal liberty. Between them they have constructed the philosophy which informs the Tea Party movement: its members mobilise for freedom, unaware that the freedom they demand is freedom for corporations to trample them into the dirt. The thinktanks the Kochs have funded devise the game and the rules by which it is played; Americans for Prosperity coaches and motivates the team.

Astroturfing is now taking off in the United Kingdom. Earlier this month Spinwatch showed how a fake grassroots group set up by health insurers helped shape the Tories’ NHS reforms(18). Billionaires and corporations are capturing the political process everywhere; anyone with an interest in democracy should be thinking about how to resist them. Nothing is real any more. Nothing is as it seems.

Monbiot.com

References:

1. See, for example, the exposure of astroturfing in Chapter 2 of my book Heat: how to stop the planet burning, 2006.

2. Profile Of Billionaire David Koch - Executives - Portfolio.com

3. Tea Party movement: Billionaire Koch brothers who helped it grow | World news | The Guardian

4. http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/Global...retly-fund.pdf

5. The billionaire Koch brothers’ war against Obama : The New Yorker

6. How Oil Heir and New York Arts Patron David Koch Became the Tea Party's Wallet -- New York Magazine

7. (Astro) Turf Wars

8. (Astro) Turf Wars

9. Greenpeace’s report on funding by the Koch brothers and their foundations shows that they spent $5m on AFP’s Hot Air tour alone. http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/Global...retly-fund.pdf

10. News Headlines

11. (Astro) Turf Wars

12. The billionaire Koch brothers’ war against Obama : The New Yorker

13. The billionaire Koch brothers’ war against Obama : The New Yorker

14. http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/Global...retly-fund.pdf

15. Rule Breaker: In Washington, Tiny Think Tank Wields Big Stick on Regulation | Mercatus

16. http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/Global...retly-fund.pdf

17. Interview with Brian Doherty, reported by The New Yorker. The billionaire Koch brothers’ war against Obama : The New Yorker

18. Private health lobby out in force at Tory conference
__________________
"Patriotism means being loyal to your country all the time and to its government when it deserves it."-- Mark Twain

"Inter arma silent Musae"--when the weapons speak, the muses fall silent.

An't nanum hearm deth, doth hwaet ye willath.

It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished
unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets. -Voltaire

Economic Left/Right: -3.88
Authoritarian/Libertarian: -4.36
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 27-10-10, 09:27 AM
Zichao's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,038
Default

Christ what a slimey, self-satisfied cunt that man is (and I'm not keen on Monbiot either ).

While I often disagree with the tea-partiers, I admire the general sentiment behind their aspirations, and even if I didn't I'm not going to call everyone who disagrees with me a pathetic, deluded schlep.

Incidentally, he confuses astroturfing and solliciting public support.
__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 27-10-10, 09:34 AM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,639
Default

Originally Posted by Zichao View Post
While I often disagree with the tea-partiers, I admire the general sentiment behind their aspirations...
You got me there. What general sentiment are we talking about?
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 27-10-10, 09:42 AM
Zichao's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,038
Default

Anti-big government. Sure they're wrong in most, if not all of the specifics, but it's nice to see people bucking the trend.
__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 27-10-10, 09:57 AM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,639
Default

Originally Posted by Zichao View Post
Anti-big government. Sure they're wrong in most, if not all of the specifics, but it's nice to see people bucking the trend.
Yeah, except that it's not whether the gvt is big or small but whether it's delivering value-for-money. The US gvt, on this metric, is atrocious but making it smaller & advocating less tax is not going to help... It goes back to what I was saying: As a person of (very) average income, I am taxed roughly similarly in France and in the UK. Guess where I am getting better value for money?

You know, despite what you're saying, few people want or support an intrusive, invasive government - Even New Labour membership wasn't behind its leaders who did have that agenda...
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 27-10-10, 10:55 AM
Zichao's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,038
Default

Quote:
Yeah, except that it's not whether the gvt is big or small but whether it's delivering value-for-money. The US gvt, on this metric, is atrocious but making it smaller & advocating less tax is not going to help... It goes back to what I was saying: As a person of (very) average income, I am taxed roughly similarly in France and in the UK. Guess where I am getting better value for money?
Sure, but it's not the only criterion - cabbages at 5p a go is good value for money but it doesn't help if you don't like cabbages.

Quote:
You know, despite what you're saying, few people want or support an intrusive, invasive government
Sure, not when you phrase it like that. Everyone's fiercely independent and in favour of small government in theory, but when it comes to approving the myriad little measures that come to make up big government (risk assessments, anti-smoking campaigns, public order laws) the response is a resounding yes. I think you said the same thing about Obamacare - people hate the plan as a whole but actually quite like the individual policies that constitute it.
__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 27-10-10, 11:20 AM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,639
Default

Originally Posted by Zichao View Post
Sure, but it's not the only criterion - cabbages at 5p a go is good value for money but it doesn't help if you don't like cabbages.
I am going to try and follow up on that and you tell me if that's what you meant. Because, see, imho, I think Rawlings is right - if people did not know what their position is going to be in life, they'd go for a society that provides true equality of opportunity.

The problem with many of the Tea Partiers is that they've seemed to have done OKay by themselves and thus no longer want to pay the bills that go with providing equality of opportunity for everyone else/their neighbours' kids. It's basically selfishness disguised as concern for public finance.

If they were concerned for public finance, they'd want the rich or the really rich and companies to be taxed more...

Thus, in reality, if you're discussing behind Rawlings's "veil of ignorance", everyone likes cabbage... especially at 5p a go.

Quote:
When it comes to approving the myriad little measures that come to make up big government (risk assessments, anti-smoking campaigns, public order laws) the response is a resounding yes. I think you said the same thing about Obamacare - people hate the plan as a whole but actually quite like the individual policies that constitute it.
Fair counter-argument. People are deceiving themselves quite regularly.

OTOH, I do note that things like risk assessments, anti-smoking campaigns etc, are your own personal bugs. Most people, when they talk about Big Government, means the level of taxation they're experiencing. If they're a bit more economically trained, they'll point out to the share of gvt spending as a % of GDP:



Ratio public expenditure on GDP by country in Europe, according to the most recent Eurostat data. This map will by updated as much as possible. Legend : maroon > 55%, red 50-55%, orange 45-50%, yellow 40-45%, green 35-40%, blue 30-35%, purple < 30% (not presently used).
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 27-10-10, 10:32 PM
FredFredson's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: North America
Posts: 1,749
Default

Quote:
Incidentally, he confuses astroturfing and solliciting public support.
Astroturfing is the business of creating the impression of spontaneous grassroots support for a cause. Feed enough money into the right hands and all kinds of support seems to appear out of thin air.

The Koch's are experts at that.

F
__________________
"Patriotism means being loyal to your country all the time and to its government when it deserves it."-- Mark Twain

"Inter arma silent Musae"--when the weapons speak, the muses fall silent.

An't nanum hearm deth, doth hwaet ye willath.

It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished
unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets. -Voltaire

Economic Left/Right: -3.88
Authoritarian/Libertarian: -4.36
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 28-10-10, 01:27 PM
Zichao's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,038
Default

Originally Posted by FredFredson View Post
Astroturfing is the business of creating the impression of spontaneous grassroots support for a cause. Feed enough money into the right hands and all kinds of support seems to appear out of thin air.
But by that definition all canvassing is astroturfing and anyone who's ever given their support to a political party is being had.

Quote:
I am going to try and follow up on that and you tell me if that's what you meant. Because, see, imho, I think Rawlings is right - if people did not know what their position is going to be in life, they'd go for a society that provides true equality of opportunity.

The problem with many of the Tea Partiers is that they've seemed to have done OKay by themselves and thus no longer want to pay the bills that go with providing equality of opportunity for everyone else/their neighbours' kids. It's basically selfishness disguised as concern for public finance.

If they were concerned for public finance, they'd want the rich or the really rich and companies to be taxed more...

Thus, in reality, if you're discussing behind Rawlings's "veil of ignorance", everyone likes cabbage... especially at 5p a go.
*shrugs* I never claimed they were infallible.

Quote:
Fair counter-argument. People are deceiving themselves quite regularly.

OTOH, I do note that things like risk assessments, anti-smoking campaigns etc, are your own personal bugs. Most people, when they talk about Big Government, means the level of taxation they're experiencing. If they're a bit more economically trained, they'll point out to the share of gvt spending as a % of GDP:
The right to bear arms, states' rights etc. etc.

And yes, I know that the small government they're advocating would wind up being way more intrusive and illiberal than the "big" government they hate so much, still doesn't change that I admire the original impulse.
__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 28-10-10, 02:59 PM
Zichao's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,038
Default

Quote:
>> Electile dysfunction <<
Birthday cards from the SSA

It's America's midterm elections next
week and this time round there's a
fair few wingnuts standing. Why
this is might be explained by this,
our favourite story from the
campaign trail:

Bob Inglis, of South Carolina, lost a
vicious Republican primary fight with a
right-wing insurgent named Trey Gowdy
to stand for a Congressional seat.

Inglis said he was amazed that when
he was out canvassing he kept meeting
voters who were convinced that the
numbers on their Social Security cards
meant that they had been bought at birth
by a secret bank.
Latest Issue | Popbitch
__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.
Reply With Quote
Reply


(View-All Members who have read this thread : 6
contracycle, FredFredson, Gilles de Rais, Jayne B, roadkill, Zichao
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0