TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum  

Go Back   TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum » Main Forum » Politics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 22-10-10, 07:31 PM
Zichao's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,038
Default Clinton mislaid nuclear launch code for months, General reveals

Clinton mislaid nuclear launch code for months, General reveals - Americas, World - The Independent

Quote:
Bill Clinton was an American president of charisma and vision. But he did not always have the patience for the peskier details of his job – like never, ever forgetting to have those nuclear launch codes in his top pocket, or at least somewhere on his person.


According to a former top military official at the time, Mr Clinton managed to mislay not for hours, but for months, the special plastic card with the codes that in military and White House parlance is called "the biscuit". Without it, the president is theoretically unable to order a nuclear launch.

The extraordinary revelation comes towards the end of a new memoir from General Hugh Shelton, who served under President Clinton as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called "Without Hesitation: The Odyssey of An American Warrior".

Related articles
•Rupert Cornwell: As presidential mishaps go, this one takes 'the biscuit'
Search the news archive for more stories
General Shelton, who spoke about the book on ABC News yesterday, wrote: "At one point during the Clinton administration the codes were actually missing for months. That's a big deal – a gargantuan deal."

Scholars of Clinton's time in the White House will not be entirely surprised by this news. No one could rival him for detailed knowledge of policy, but time-keeping, the ability to stick to a schedule and other more mundane functions were not Clinton's speciality.

Retired Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Robert Patterson, a well- known critic of the former president, told a strikingly similar tale of absent-mindedness in his own book about his years of service. Patterson, who at times carried the launch briefcase, known as "the football", for the president, claimed that the day after the story about Mr Clinton and his liaison with former intern Monica Lewinsky first broke, he asked him for "the biscuit" only to discover that the Commander-in-Chief couldn't find it.

"He thought he just placed them upstairs," Patterson wrote. "We called upstairs, we started a search around the White House for the codes, and he finally confessed that he in fact misplaced them. He couldn't recall when he had last seen them."

It may be that Mr Clinton was so confident that the threat of nuclear warfare was over that he felt the biscuit-carrying tradition was superfluous. Alternatively, the lapse – if the claims in the memoirs are true – might be considered as evidence as carelessness verging on dereliction of duty.

The secrecy that necessarily accompanies the arrangements for a nuclear launch has created a degree of mythology about American presidents and "the football". Most of the mechanics of ordering a launch in retaliation for an attack against the United States, have become public over the years.

Wherever the president travels, a military aide stays close with "the football", a black briefcase, which appears to have an antenna protruding from it. The case contains a booklet setting out the options for nuclear retaliation and has the communication capacity to connect him with the Pentagon and Central Command.

Crucial to the system, however, is "the biscuit". On it are printed a series of codes that the president must read out prior to ordering a launch. Only when commanders hear these codes will they know for certain that it is the president talking. Thus, an almost comic scene springs to mind had Mr Clinton ever found himself in the middle of a nuclear strike crisis. As the warheads of an enemy nation sped around the globe towards an American metropolis, the president would be fumbling through his pockets like a passenger at airport security.

Still, he may not be the only Democrat former commander-in-chief with biscuit crumbs, if not egg, on his face. There have long been tales around the White House – never confirmed though – that the President Jimmy Carter once sent a suit to the dry cleaners with the card and the secret codes inside.
A booklet? You're shitting me? You mean this isn't the sort of stuff you should have memorised?

"Congratulations on buying your LGM-30 Minuteman system... blah... Conditions of use... Would you like to register your software... blah... Goddamnit, Michelle, the assembly instructions are all in Swedish!"
__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 22-10-10, 08:32 PM
Benjamin's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SW Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,312
Default

He lost it becuase he 'wanted' to lose it. His way of rejecting that particular responsibility. Same deal with Carter. Fundemental pacifist leanings.

Rather odd in a person with Carter's background, but people make funny career choices for all sorts of reason, and then 'evolve.'
__________________
"Neither man nor nation can exist without a sublime idea."
Fyodor Dostoyevsky, 1821 - 1881
QOTD

My BLOG: Things Have Changed
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 23-10-10, 08:41 AM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,639
Default

Carter certainly. Clinton? He wasn't exactly a pacifist - but I suspect he did have a "Look, this is just for laugh, ok? No one's going to attack us with nukes so fuck off - And, hey, dude, I am the president and I abide, mokay"... loveable rogue all the way.

"Bill Clinton was an American president of charisma and vision": Charisma, yes, clearly. Vision? Where?
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 25-10-10, 10:23 AM
Zichao's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,038
Default

Also, let's face it, the US in those days would only ever have used nukes defensively, which in the case of a full scale attack wouldn't help one bit in any case - you'd just be mass murdering Russians to no good end. I certainly hope that if I was the US president and I found myself suddenly on the receiving end of all-out nuclear war I'd have the balls to do nothing.

If it's just one stray missile, on the other hand, then yeah I might nuke Omsk or something just to teach them not to be so careless.
__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 26-10-10, 10:25 AM
Benjamin's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SW Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,312
Default

Strategy says you go for the remaining enemy nukes. First one to run out loses.* So you want a Prezy with options who knows how to use them.

A final spasm of city-busting, though, would indeed be futile and evil.


* as does everyone in a big exchange, of course, even though the 'nuclear winter' guys made up their data.
__________________
"Neither man nor nation can exist without a sublime idea."
Fyodor Dostoyevsky, 1821 - 1881
QOTD

My BLOG: Things Have Changed
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 26-10-10, 12:55 PM
Zichao's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,038
Default

Yes, I was thinking of an all-out attack, which I actually suspect is far more probable than this targetting enemy silos business. For a start now they have subs and moveable platforms it's kind of obsolete, and for another I just can't see a leader in a US-Russia conflict ever thinking to himself "Well I'll just launch one or two, I can stop whenever I like."
__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.
Reply With Quote
Reply


(View-All Members who have read this thread : 3
Benjamin, Gilles de Rais, Zichao
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0