TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum  

Go Back   TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum » Main Forum » Politics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-10, 01:59 PM
contracycle's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,150
Default On boardroom pay, chief executives just don't get it

On boardroom pay, chief executives just don't get it

We're told we're in a new age of austerity, yet top pay and bonuses still rise astronomically – heedless of public disgust


o Deborah Hargreaves
o guardian.co.uk, Friday 11 June 2010 12.00 BST


The new age of austerity means "we're all in this together," according to David Cameron. But has no one told Britain's bosses yet?

Boardroom pay continues to ratchet up even for companies with lacklustre performance. Stuart Rose, Marks and Spencer's outgoing chief executive, saw a 140% increase in his rewards for last year – even though profits were only up by 5%.

While most employees have seen their salaries frozen or even cut, those at the top continue to reap the lion's share of the benefits. The ratio between the salaries of the boardroom and the shop floor has doubled in the past 10 years. Chief executives of Britain's largest companies now receive 81 times the rewards of their employees. Even where companies are in trouble or posting a loss, executives manage to justify a boost to their income.

It is hard to follow the justification offered in many cases. It usually focuses on "benchmarking" others in the same industry. That industry is almost always global and the bosses to imitate are usually in America. Leaving aside the rarity of a British exec crossing the Atlantic and making a go of it, remuneration committees always use the comparison argument as a reason for raising executive pay, never for cutting it. There must be some companies out there in the same sector who pay their bosses less, but they are never mentioned.

This makes executive salaries a giant merry-go-round of pay increases. Not just pay, but also the offer of gold-plated pensions, housing allowances and generous expenses. Maybe Britain's bosses just do not care that they stand out as greedy and grasping to fill their own pockets. Maybe they think they are worth it.

But there is a serious issue at stake. The vast gulf in salaries and wealth has led to an unprecedented wave of distrust for business among the British public. And it's not just us. UK companies are not covering themselves in glory on the world stage right now.

BP's boss Tony Hayward has become a hate figure in the US and the Pru's foray into Asia has turned into a debacle. Our companies are not enhancing their reputations worldwide – and if we don't trust them, who will?

This also comes at a time when the employers' organisation, the CBI, has started special pleading for rich people to be let off the increase in capital gains tax and for the top rate of income tax to be reduced back to 40%. Do they just not get it?

We are entering a period of extended belt-tightening in this country where many people will end up losing their jobs and those that don't could see their purchasing power eroded by a rise in inflation and a freeze in pay. For company bosses to be lining their pockets with wads of cash is the height of selfishness. Cameron has suggested that top people in the public sector should not be paid more than 20 times the average wage in their business. It is about time this was introduced for the private sector, too.

On boardroom pay, chief executives just don't get it | Deborah Hargreaves | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-10, 02:41 PM
insignificant data point
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,799
Default

Quote:
Do they just not get it?
Apparently, no. Despite extensive public debate on this issue, I don't recall any of them coming out to justify why some big cheese requires $10 million a year to keep groceries on his table.

An interesting public campaign might be to hound and suss these people to find out what actually happens to their money. Have they found secret restaurants that charge $1000 for a gourmet hamburger?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-10, 07:47 PM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,639
Default

Originally Posted by roadkill View Post
Apparently, no. Despite extensive public debate on this issue, I don't recall any of them coming out to justify why some big cheese requires $10 million a year to keep groceries on his table. An interesting public campaign might be to hound and suss these people to find out what actually happens to their money. Have they found secret restaurants that charge $1000 for a gourmet hamburger?
That would be the weakest argument of them all. That's just envy re-written as pious frugality.

No, the point is that, if profit are up 5% (nicely done, in this economy as well), 140% raise do seem a bit over the top. By possibly a 120 to a 135%...
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
Reply


(View-All Members who have read this thread : 5
contracycle, Gilles de Rais, LiberalNation, Noir, roadkill
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0