TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum  

Go Back   TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum » Main Forum » Politics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-11, 10:23 AM
contracycle's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,150
Default Private firm to run NHS hospital

Private firm to run NHS hospital

Circle Healthcare will take over Hinchingbrooke Health Care NHS Trust in Cambridgeshire as part of a £1bn 10-year contract

guardian.co.uk, Thursday 10 November 2011 08.19 GMT

A private company, listed on the stock market, has been given the right to deliver a full range of hospital services for the first time in the history of the NHS, reigniting a debate about the use of business in the health sector.

Circle Healthcare, a John Lewis-style partnership valued at around £120m, will manage the debt-laden Hinchingbrooke hospital in Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, from February after the government signed off on a decade-long contract on Wednesday.

Although private sector firms already operate units within the NHS – such as hip replacement centres – Circle, one of Britain's most prominent healthcare providers, is the first to take over an entire hospital.

The takeover is not considered a full privatisation as the buildings will remain in public hands and the employees retain their pay and pension on existing terms.

However, Circle is viewed by ministers as a model "mutual" with 49% of its ownership in staff hands. It operates a scheme to allow more shares to be gained through a performance-related rewards system.

Significantly this allows doctors to take a slice of the profits – and this landmark deal, the government hopes, will lead to other cash-strapped NHS hospitals consider outsourcing their management to private companies.

Circle's chief executive, Ali Parsa, said: "At a time when some healthcare commentators say the solution for small district general hospitals is simply to merge or be shut down, we believe the NHS Midlands and East's courage and zeal for innovation will enable us to show how clinician and staff control can provide a more sustainable alternative."

Circle beat outsourcer Serco to clinch the deal a year ago. The company has ambitious plans to expand – in its share prospectus it said it had brought land in five city centres to expand its hospital services.

The market to run state-owned acute services is worth £8bn and with hospitals forced to find savings every year, experts warn that many will have to consider private help to meet efficiency targets.

Two NHS trusts are considering private sector management options — the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital and the Whiston Hospital (St Helens).

The head of health at Unison, Christina McAnea, told the BBC a new management team could have been found without going private.

"We just don't accept there is no expertise within an organisation the size of the NHS, and to turn to the private sector which has a very patchy record in delivering these kind of services is an accident waiting to happen."

Private firm to run NHS hospital | Society | guardian.co.uk
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-11, 11:25 AM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,639
Default

Hold on. I agree that 'profit' making is pretty dangerous when it comes something to health care. The asymmetry of information is just too glaring and I'd like to know what mechanisms they think is going to correct it.

OTOH, mutualism is not necessarily a bad thing. But, to work really well, the customers usually have to be involved as well in the profit sharing scheme. If it's just nurses and doctors being shareholders, it will probably lead to improvement in productivity and such but might not do much to convince these to not inflict extra operations and over-charge their customers...
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-11, 10:30 PM
Zan de Man's Avatar
Who's the Prime Minister?
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Conwy, Wales
Posts: 360
Default

This is going to be interesting. Circle Health have never run anything bigger than a private sector treatment centre.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-11, 11:29 AM
Zichao's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,038
Default

In France I think the medical unions negociate it with the government each year, like "you can charge 23 euros for consultations, but you have to promise to hand out 5% fewer sick notes than last year". Granted quotas aren't perfect, but I've never heard of anyone being refused treatment because of them.
__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-11, 11:47 AM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,639
Default

Well, they do sometimes stick you with a less effective / cheaper treatment. I know that my mother was livid with anger because, when my sister was a teenager, the doctor who had treated me for acne, advised for a weaker & cheaper product for my sister and thus she suffered for a year or something from an extremely virulent acne explosion.

Eventually, iirc, they saw a different specialist, who hadn't exhausted his allotted amount of the more expensive product and my sister's acne was reduced to more manageable levels.

It's not life threatening but, for a teenager, being acne-free or as near as possible, matters.
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 13-11-11, 02:28 PM
contracycle's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,150
Default

Care may suffer, admits private company taking over NHS hospital

Uproar as Circle Health confirms in document that critics' unease about patients is justified


Daniel Boffey, policy editor
guardian.co.uk, Saturday 12 November 2011 22.13 GMT


The first private company to take over an NHS hospital has admitted in a document seen by the Observer that patient care could suffer under its plans to expand its empire and seek profit from the health service.

Circle Health is already feeling a strain on resources due to its aggressive business strategy, the document reveals, and the firm's ambition to further expand into the NHS "could affect its ability to provide a consistent level of service to its patients", it says.

The company, run by a former Goldman Sachs banker, was awarded management of Hinchingbrooke hospital in Cambridgeshire last week in a ground-reaking move lauded by ministers as a "good deal for patients and staff".

However, the government was forced to answer an urgent question in the Commons after the move sparked furious accusations that the deal was privatising the NHS and putting jobs and health services in jeopardy. Concerns over the future of the health service were further heightened when David Cameron, in a speech on regulation and the economy, said he wanted the NHS to be a "fantastic business for Britain".

The revelation that the company shares some of the fears of its critics has caused fresh uproar.

The head of health at the public sector union Unison, Christina McAnea, said it was an admission of the danger of bringing profit-seeking organisations into the health service. She said: "What they are saying, in black and white, is what we have been saying all along: that introducing profit into the NHS risks putting patient services under strain. This is a very real fear for patients at Hinchingbrooke hospital.


"If the company is allowed to expand into the NHS as the government brings in its reforms through the Health and Social Care Bill this, it appears, could put many more patients at risk."

Circle's admissions come in a share prospectus it was legally obliged to publish in June when the parent company, Circle Holdings, floated in London. It had been in negotiations with the government for two years over the takeover of Hinchingbrooke hospital; as the preferred bidder, it expected to be successful. In its document, the company reveals its aspiration to take over further hospitals but also spells out the risks to patients. It says: "As well as the establishment of further independent hospitals, Circle intends to significantly expand its NHS business.

"Circle's growth has placed, and its anticipated growth will continue to place, a strain on its managerial, administrative, operational, financial, information technology and other resources and could affect its ability to provide a consistent level of service to its patients."

Circle Health will manage the debt-laden Hinchingbrooke hospital from February, after the government approved on a decade-long contract worth £1bn. Although private sector firms already operate units within the NHS – such as hip replacement centres – Circle, one of Britain's most prominent healthcare providers, is the first to take over an entire hospital. The government says the takeover is not to be considered a full privatisation, as the buildings will remain in public hands and the employees retain their pay and pension on existing terms. However, the company will make a profit if the hospital, which is £40m in debt, achieves an annual surplus, which the company hopes to achieve through a new management style and cost-cutting.

Circle, which is backed by City hedge funds run by Crispin Odey and Paul Ruddock, who have donated £790,000 to the Conservative party, admits in its share prospectus to having made losses since it was set up in 2004. The latest accounts show an operating loss of £34.97m as of December 2010.

Labour MP Valerie Vaz, who sits on the health select committee, said the revelation should prompt second thoughts by ministers: "It is difficult to comprehend how Circle can maintain a proper standard of healthcare while maximising profit; as a company they would have to make a profit, but that can only come if costs are cut – such as a shorter stay in bed to recover, one less nurse. That must compromise patient care," she said.

Circle is viewed by ministers as a model "mutual" with 49% of its ownership in staff hands. It operates a scheme to allow more shares to be gained through a performance-related rewards system. Its structure allows doctors to take a slice of the profits, and the government believes that could lead to other struggling hospitals outsourcing their management to private companies.

The market to run state-owned acute services is worth £8bn and, with hospitals forced to find savings every year, experts warn that many will have to consider private help to meet efficiency targets.

Two NHS trusts are considering private sector management options: the Royal National Orthopaedic hospital in London and the Whiston hospital (St Helens) on Merseyside.

A Circle spokeswoman said: "Every stock market admission document contains a large number of risk factors to account for every conceivable eventuality. For example, other risk factors cited in Circle's case include incurring financial penalties as a result of failure to comply with environmental regulations. For a young and fast-growing company, citing the risks involved in managing that growth is a statement of the obvious."

The shadow health secretary, Andy Burnham, said: "The more we learn about this deal, the more we hear worrying echoes of Southern Cross. It will not fill people with confidence to hear that, by its own admission, this company has doubts about whether it can meet the continuity of service and consistency of care that is essential in the NHS. In their desperation to open up the NHS to the private sector, it seems ministers are taking an unacceptable gamble with essential services."

Care may suffer, admits private company taking over NHS hospital | Politics | The Observer
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 13-11-11, 03:40 PM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,639
Default

Originally Posted by contracycle View Post
Circle's admissions come in a share prospectus it was legally obliged to publish in June when the parent company.
Edit: I started reacting before reading:

Quote:
A Circle spokeswoman said: "Every stock market admission document contains a large number of risk factors to account for every conceivable eventuality. For example, other risk factors cited in Circle's case include incurring financial penalties as a result of failure to comply with environmental regulations. For a young and fast-growing company, citing the risks involved in managing that growth is a statement of the obvious."
Yep. A company's "red" isn't very useful when it comes to the list of challenges the company faces. They're forced to list every sundry thing. Some manage a bit of "humour" - slight financial variations of "if a meteor crashes on us, it will severely affect our operations"...

That doesn't mean that running health care for profit is a good idea but I am just saying this isn't a smoking gun by any mean.
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
Reply


(View-All Members who have read this thread : 4
contracycle, Gilles de Rais, Zan de Man, Zichao
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0