TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum  

Go Back   TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum » Main Forum » General & Current Events

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-09-11, 05:54 PM
Zichao's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,037
Default The UK has to get over its prudishness about sex

The UK has to get over its prudishness about sex | Johnny Anglais | Comment is free | The Guardian

Quote:
Yesterday, I was informed by the General Teaching Council this week that I would be permitted to return to teaching, a pleasant surprise after the increasing controversy about my persona: in July 2010 I was suspended from the school where I used to work as head of personal, social and health education, after the authorities discovered that I also earned money for stripping in clubs.

While I disagree with any sanction being imposed, I am content and satisfied that it is a fair decision under the circumstances. I believe the GTC's decision is a recognition of the strength of the arguments that I raised to challenge the view that activities in adult entertainment might "undermine public trust and confidence" in people working in the teaching profession.

My defence hinged on a number of factors: some disputable, some indisputable. First: is the impact of pornography on our society really as damaging as some want us to believe? Had I not been raised by two open-minded parents who worked in sex education and the sex industry, I might have shared their view, associating porn with social ills: paedophilia, rape, sex slavery, abuse, HIV, teen sex, the degradation of women. But I don't think we should accept a view just because it is held by a large number of people.

Tthere is no evidence to prove pornography has either a negative or, for that matter, a positive effect on society. There are scraps of research, but no proof whatsoever.

Millions of men and women legally purchase, view and enjoy pornography as a form of entertainment every day. The vast majority of these people are decent, law-abiding individuals.

Pornography, in its simplest form (and I accept that there are unsavoury parts of the industry, including the exploitation of women and men – but then there are unsavoury aspects in most industries) is about the depiction of a legally consenting adult having sex with another legally consenting adult (or more, why should numbers matter?) What, in essence, is wrong with that process?

Anyone under the age of 18 viewing pornography in this country is doing so illegally. I would not condone them doing so. However, I do not see that the viewing sexual intercourse, or witnessing human nudity, poses any threat or danger to that child. If anything, exposure to the realities of sex and nudity and living in a society where we are happy to discuss such issues openly, makes for a far safer and healthier environment for young people.

Sex and pornography are shrouded in a veil of mystery in this country. If young people have access to the same levels of online pornography as our European counterparts (which they do), wWhy do we have the highest rate of teenage pregnancy and the highest rates of STIs in Europe? My view is that it's not because of exposure to depictions of sex, but because we are not open enough to talk about it – particularly compared with our Dutch, Scandinavian and German neighbours. When we refuse to talk about something in public, then young people are more inclined to experiment in private, and to do so without the adequate tools to make informed choices. Telling young people that sex is always "bad", "wrong" and "immoral" is simply not an adequate response.

Our society is faced with hypocrisies and inconsistencies, the riots up and down our great land only served to demonstrate this – we didn't need the recent riots and the subsequent punishments to be reminded of that. But my case also shows that some people wish to take a hardline approach on an activity that poses no proven threat on society whatsoever. While a teacher working in the sex industry must be banned, teachers who publicly indulge in activities that are linked to thousands of deaths each and every year – such as smoking, drinking and overeating – are tolerated.

Prior to the legal ban being imposed in 2007, I worked in a school where smoking was sanctioned by the provision of a smoking room. How many deaths are associated with smoking? I have worked in a school that provided alcohol at events attended by parents and students. How much misery is linked to alcohol? I have worked with a member of the Catholic clergy, who provided lessons on contraception during the week, and told his congregation that contraception was wrong and evil on the weekend. How many deaths of Aids sufferers around the world can be laid at the hands of the Catholic faith?

When it comes to porn and our society, we desperately need to start putting things into perspective. Porn is going nowhere – we had better learn to deal with it in a grown-up way. And young people aren't machines that we can indoctrinate with our irrational fears and prejudices. They are far too clever for that.

Johnny Anglais is the stage name of suspended teacher Benedict Garrett
What's interesting here isn't so much the article, which makes some pretty obvious common sense points, but the pursed lips puritanism of the comments.

And FWIW I think you're lovely, Johnny. The moment I've got some cash I'm going to pay for you to come over here and give me a PSHE lesson.
__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-09-11, 07:05 PM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,639
Default

The comments are scary, yes... I think, to be on the safe side, our children should not be taught by anyone having ever had sex. Or impure thoughts. Too dangerous. You want them to have role models, don't you?
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-09-11, 08:18 PM
Zichao's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,037
Default

No, Mr Garrett, porn is not 'completely natural' – Telegraph Blogs

Quote:
In the real world, post-pubescent women are not generally as devoid of pubic hair as a Greek marble statue, clad in naughty nurse’s uniforms, or desirous of the most violent forms of sex with a number of men at once.
Maybe not the ones you hang out with...

Strangely, the Torygraph's comments section (motto: Whatever It Is We're Against It) is way more tolerant of this than the sandal-eating, muesli-wearing Graun readers.
__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-09-11, 08:46 PM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,639
Default

Yep.

Besides, if Jenny wants to be taken seriously, maybe she shouldn't put a pic of herself where she is pouting very sexily indeed. I would quite fancy watching a porn movie with her in it. And I suspect she doesn't actually have a huge bush herself. That's just not what modern girls do, especially good looking ones...
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-09-11, 10:40 PM
contracycle's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,149
Default

Originally Posted by Zichao View Post

Strangely, the Torygraph's comments section (motto: Whatever It Is We're Against It) is way more tolerant of this than the sandal-eating, muesli-wearing Graun readers.
Really? I'm not seeing it.

That this man has been allowed to go back to Beal High School in Ilford shows how truly wet and ruined by considerations of political correctness we have become.
This school teaches girls as well as boys.
As the parent of a young girl, would YOU be happy that she might be taught by a man who appears in porn films?
It is utterly, utterly RIDICULOUS that Benedict Garrett is to be allowed to come into contact with impressionable children.
He is a perverted disgrace to the teaching profession.


There are possible criticisms to make but this is just reactionary bullshit.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-11, 03:49 AM
AnonymousIdiotSavant's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,089
Default

Originally Posted by Gilles de Rais View Post
Yep.

Besides, if Jenny wants to be taken seriously, maybe she shouldn't put a pic of herself where she is pouting very sexily indeed. I would quite fancy watching a porn movie with her in it. And I suspect she doesn't actually have a huge bush herself. That's just not what modern girls do, especially good looking ones...
Actually the bush is making a bit of a comeback, at least here in the US.
__________________
Righteousness will always be the trap at the gates of hell
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-11, 08:30 AM
Zichao's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,037
Default

Originally Posted by contracycle View Post
Really? I'm not seeing it.

That this man has been allowed to go back to Beal High School in Ilford shows how truly wet and ruined by considerations of political correctness we have become.
This school teaches girls as well as boys.
As the parent of a young girl, would YOU be happy that she might be taught by a man who appears in porn films?
It is utterly, utterly RIDICULOUS that Benedict Garrett is to be allowed to come into contact with impressionable children.
He is a perverted disgrace to the teaching profession.


There are possible criticisms to make but this is just reactionary bullshit.
I meant in general, I wasn't talking about each specific case.

Though I do like the fact that this chap appears to be perfectly fine with having his son taught by a sex worker. I presume this is an example of the public school spirit, about which I have heard so much.
__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-11, 08:34 AM
Zichao's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,037
Default

Originally Posted by AnonymousIdiotSavant View Post
Actually the bush is making a bit of a comeback, at least here in the US.
I heard about that too, which had me wondering a bit, but then I got distracted by the woman who had a Damien Hurst butterfly tattoo replaced it at the top of my Genital-Related News Feed (surely she only has to let herself go for a few days and that thing is going to be a fucking abomination, not to mention when she gets old).
__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-11, 09:25 AM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,639
Default

Originally Posted by AnonymousIdiotSavant View Post
Actually the bush is making a bit of a comeback, at least here in the US.
Au naturel or trimmed? I don't think "trimmed" counts as "bush". "Bush" is "just let nature takes its course"... Which isn't a big issue either way but there's a difference in how it looks...
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-11, 09:36 AM
AnonymousIdiotSavant's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,089
Default

We're not talking free range, but not just a racing stripe either.
__________________
Righteousness will always be the trap at the gates of hell
Reply With Quote
Reply


(View-All Members who have read this thread : 5
AnonymousIdiotSavant, contracycle, Gilles de Rais, wanqing59, Zichao
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0