TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum  

Go Back   TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum » Main Forum » General & Current Events

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 30-08-11, 06:11 AM
LiberalNation's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: KY, USA
Posts: 1,199
Default Local Ford workers say they are considering strike .

Can anyone say Toyata & honda.

Local Ford workers say they are considering strike | WHAS11.com Louisville

LOUISVILLE, Ky. (WHAS11)- As they exited Louisville's two UAW halls after casting their ballots on a strike authorization vote, local Ford workers said they made big sacrifices four years ago to help Ford survive. Now, they want Ford to restore those concessions and are willing to go on strike if Ford does not agree.

Monday was the first of two days of voting within the membership of United Auto Workers Local 862. Todd Dunn, the local union president, would not predict the outcome but said that in past years, the results have been nearly unanimous in favor of authorizing a strike.

Dunn said the vote is a reflection of solidarity among the union members, sending a unified message to UAW bargainers negotiating a new contract with Ford, GM and Chrysler.

The UAW's contract with the Big Three automakers expires on September 14. UAW officials recently characterized negotiations with Ford as "ahead of schedule," and one report even suggested that a strike authorization vote may not be necessary.

Despite United Auto Workers President Bob King saying Monday that he is "upbeat" about reaching a new contract, Louisville's UAW members sent a message on Monday. They want King to hold Ford's feet to the fire.

"I think a strike. if we have to," said Cathy Pafundi, a 19 year Ford/UAW worker, "I'm going to do what we have to do."

"We want them to just recognize what we gave up," said Timothy Yute, a Ford worker who transferred to the Kentucky Truck Plant from Atlanta five years ago.

"Ford remains committed to working with the UAW to reach an agreement that is fair to our employees and retirees, which continues to support our turnaround efforts in North America at the same time," said Ford spokesperson Marcey Evans.

Four years ago, UAW members agreed to a number of concessions to help Ford avoid bankruptcy. in Louisville, the union members want their leadership to strike a better deal, now.

"We gave up some holidays," said Jason Vaughn, "We gave up some raises."

"The Cost of Living (adjustment) has been taken away," added another KTP worker, "and that's been a big thing, just helping us keep up with inflation."

The strike authorization vote at UAW Local 862 appears to be more than just a formality.

"We actually informed our members, you know now is the time to start saving," Dunn said, "Save your money. Here's how much money you need to save in advance. Here's what you need to do if we go on strike, you know our strike captains. So, we put the machine in place... just in case."

Yet, what if the new contract demands would put Ford back in jeopardy?

"I don't think the company or the employees would let that happen," Pafundi said, "I think we would give up some more if we had to, which I would."

But while the gettin's good?

"But while the gettin's good, I hope we can get some."

The national UAW leadership appears far less demanding, suggesting that instead of pushing for higher wages, the new contract will probably focus on profit sharing in order that the automakers' recovery isn't overburdened with higher fixed costs.

The new Ford/UAW workers now being hired for the rebirth of the Louisville Assembly Plant are in line for wages about half of what current autoworkers earn. The two-tier wage system was a major concession in the 2007 contract. Yet., the UAW President reportedly wants the new contract to move those new workers to higher wages, sooner.

"I think Ford is back on top and will stay on top and is profitable," Vaughn said, "and I think we deserve those things back."

The national union says the new contract needs to keep American automakers competitive. Union members say they have already done that.

Because of details in the auto bailouts, the UAW cannot strike GM or Chrysler, only Ford.
__________________
Give unto Caesar that what is Caesar's, and lie like hell to keep as much of the rest of your shit as you can.

"If you want something said ask a man...if you want something done, ask a woman" Margaret Thatcher
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 31-08-11, 09:43 AM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,639
Default

Originally Posted by LiberalNation View Post
Can anyone say Toyata & Honda.
If they're producing in America, their workforce is probably not paid too differently from Ford workforce. The fact that they aren't saddled by the same amount of pension-related liabilities is a unique facet of the fucked up American system - Same problem with health care. Employers should definitely NOT be the one providing you with health care.

If they're producing outside of the US and exploiting undefended workforce in some shithole like China or India - Slap them down with tarriffs until they bleed all their extra illegitimate profit.

Quote:
The national UAW leadership appears far less demanding, suggesting that instead of pushing for higher wages, the new contract will probably focus on profit sharing in order that the automakers' recovery isn't overburdened with higher fixed costs.
Good thinking. In general, if the workforce wants a bigger slice of the pie, they are going to have to be willing to share in the ups and downs, just as the shareholders. But, if the business is successful then they'll get nicely rewarded for their work...
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 31-08-11, 04:35 PM
LiberalNation's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: KY, USA
Posts: 1,199
Default

Toyota plants are US based with the parts imported ( 1 in KY infact), they pay well but without the union and benifit troubles......
__________________
Give unto Caesar that what is Caesar's, and lie like hell to keep as much of the rest of your shit as you can.

"If you want something said ask a man...if you want something done, ask a woman" Margaret Thatcher
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 31-08-11, 04:55 PM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,639
Default

The issue of benefit, as I said, is a very American fuck-up. It makes no sense to have individual companies providing individualised benefits. I mean, gym membership or whatnot sure. But health care and retirement being tied up to a company is asking for trouble. Few companies live forever.
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 31-08-11, 08:01 PM
LiberalNation's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: KY, USA
Posts: 1,199
Default

GM and Ford have lived longer than most despite dark days luming ever closer on the horizon at times.
__________________
Give unto Caesar that what is Caesar's, and lie like hell to keep as much of the rest of your shit as you can.

"If you want something said ask a man...if you want something done, ask a woman" Margaret Thatcher
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-09-11, 01:46 AM
contracycle's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,149
Default

That may be so, but even if it is it wouldn't be reasonable to take a principle from the exceptions to the rule and build a rule on it.

don;t we all get told that we can no longer expect a "job for life" (as if there wever were a golden age in which we could)? In which case, to tie benefits to corporate provision is just to accept that for many or most they just won't be provided.

Anyway, this shows how sectional and disunited Union movements can be. No greater good here, no broader principles.
Reply With Quote
Reply


(View-All Members who have read this thread : 4
contracycle, Gilles de Rais, LiberalNation, Zichao
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0