The Front Page Campaign, for example, receives widespread support from feminist activists, yet its motivations seem antithetical to feminist aims. It not only calls for the covers of explicit lads' mags to be covered up, but also those of the "growing number of gay magazines for both men and women".
I don't follow how that's reactionary. Surely, if seeing the cover of "Nuts" provokes massive psychic damage to the young straights, it follows that seeing the cover of "GQ" or "Attitude" should provoke massive psychic damage to the young gays...