TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum  

Go Back   TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum » Main Forum » General & Current Events

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 30-11-10, 03:22 AM
FredFredson's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: North America
Posts: 1,749
Default Attack on Iranian nuclear scientists prompts hit squad claims

Attack on Iranian nuclear scientists prompts hit squad claims

Tehran accuses the west and Israel of arranging co-ordinated bombings targeting its atomic programme
Attack on Iranian nuclear scientists prompts hit squad claims | World news | The Guardian

* Julian Borger, Saeed Kamali Dehghan
* guardian.co.uk, Monday 29 November 2010 20.39 GMT
* Article history

Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has blamed 'western governments and the Zionist regime' for the attacks. Photograph: Lucas Jackson/Reuters

Tehran today accused the west and Israel of dispatching a hit squad against its atomic programme, after an Iranian nuclear scientist was killed and another injured in co-ordinated attacks.

The attackers rode up on motorcycles and stuck bombs to the windows of the scientists' cars as they were leaving their homes in Tehran on the way to work. Seconds later the bombs detonated.

One bomb killed Majid Shahriar, of the nuclear engineering faculty at the Shahid Beheshti University in Tehran. His wife was in the car with him and was wounded. The second bomb injured Fereidoun Abbasi, 52, a nuclear physicist and professor at Shahid Besheshti, and also injured his wife.

Both men were senior figures in nuclear research. Abbasi, a former Revolutionary Guard, is named in a UN Security Council resolution imposing sanctions on Iran as working in banned nuclear activities with Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, the scientist accused by western governments of running a secret nuclear weapons programme.

Shahriari had no known links to banned nuclear work, but was highly regarded in his field. He co-authored an academic paper on fission in nuclear reactors with Ali Akbar Salehi, the head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation. An Iranian news website said he was designing a "new generation of theoretical nuclear reactors".

The attacks were similar to the assassination in January of Masoud Ali Mohammadi, an expert on particle physics, killed by a remote-control bomb strapped to a motorcycle as he was leaving his Tehran home on his way to work.

The Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, blamed "western governments and the Zionist regime" for the attacks.

Both the US and Israel are reported to be conducting covert operations aimed at slowing Iran's nuclear programme, which Tehran insists is for peaceful purposes but which western governments say is a cover for developing a nuclear warhead. Earlier this year a computer worm, Stuxnet, hit computers around the world but appeared to affect Iranian industrial plant disproportionately, particularly in the nuclear programme. Today, for the first time, Ahmadinejad admitted the worm had affected Iran's uranium enrichment. "They succeeded in creating problems for a limited number of our centrifuges with the software they had installed in electronic parts," the president said. "They did a bad thing. Fortunately our experts discovered that, and today they are not able [to do that] anymore."

Last week the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, reported that the main centrifuge plant at Natanz stopped enriching uranium altogether on November 16, and that there had been a steady decline in functioning centrifuges over the year. Nuclear experts said it was unclear what caused the problems, and speculated it could be a mix of design faults and sabotage.

Other possible suspects include a Sunni rebel group, Jundullah, which today broadcast a video confession of a man it described as a nuclear worker, who admitted the existence of an Iranian weapons programme. There was no immediate way of authenticating the video, and Jundullah made no claims of responsibility for today's bomb attacks.

The People's Mujahedin group has also been blamed by the Iranian government for terrorist incidents in the past, but has claimed in recent years to be pursuing a non-violent path for change in Iran.

Opposition Iranian bloggers were today debating the possibility that the killings were the work of the Revolutionary Guards or the state security services, with the aim of punishing the giving-away of secrets, or of preventing defections. However, there was no evidence to justify any such theory, or explain why Tehran would kill valued academics in this manner, rather than detain them or move them to the guarded compounds on which many Iranian nuclear specialists work, minded by bodyguards.

The attacks have come at a tense time, as the international community ramps up economic sanctions against Tehran, and with the possibility of an Israeli military attack hanging over the nuclear programme. US diplomatic cables leaked this week revealed that King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia had repeatedly urged the United States to mount such a military attack.

Iranian officials are due to meet with diplomats from six major powers on Sunday, but there has not yet been agreement on whether the meeting should take place in Turkey (as Tehran wants) or in Switzerland. The meeting would discuss Iran's nuclear programme and a range of other regional security and economic issues.
Who targeted the scientists?

Israel The country is pursuing covert operations aimed at hobbling Iran's nuclear programme, as a less costly alternative to mounting a full-scale military attack. Israeli officials admit that such operations are in progress but they give no detail. Israel is widely believed to be responsible for the Stuxnet computer worm that caused problems for the Iranian uranium enrichment programme. The country also has a record of using assassination as a weapon in what it regards as vital national interests.

United States George Bush, when he was president, ordered a covert programme to sabotage Iran's nuclear ambitions, and that mission is still believed to be under way. Targeted killings have been approved against terrorist targets, but the revelation that a US-backed hit squad was killing civilian scientists would be immensely damaging to the administration.

Jundullah The "Soldiers of God", a Iranian Sunni group based in Iranian Baluchistan, has carried out a series of bloody attacks in recent years that have largely been focused on military targets. The group, known as the People's Resistance Movement of Iran, broadcast a video yesterday of a captive who it claims is a worker from a secret nuclear facility. It did not claim responsibility for the morning's attacks on Iranian nuclear scientists.

The People's Mujahedin (MeK or PMOI) This longstanding rebel group carried out several bombings and assassinations in the years following the 1979 revolution, but has more recently presented itself as a non-violent group. It is focusing its efforts on having itself removed from the US state department's list of terrorist organisations.
__________________
"Patriotism means being loyal to your country all the time and to its government when it deserves it."-- Mark Twain

"Inter arma silent Musae"--when the weapons speak, the muses fall silent.

An't nanum hearm deth, doth hwaet ye willath.

It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished
unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets. -Voltaire

Economic Left/Right: -3.88
Authoritarian/Libertarian: -4.36
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 30-11-10, 10:57 AM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,639
Default

Well, if they came up the cars, why did they throw in bombs rather than shoot? Surely, less chances of injuring/killing the innocent wives and possibly an even better chance of killing the scientists?

NB: I think killing scientists is a sad sad thing to do (waste of a useful resource) but it's probably a good way to go about it, cost/benefit wise.
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 30-11-10, 06:02 PM
Francois Cellier's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: 3rd planet of Sol
Posts: 2,101
Default

Originally Posted by Gilles de Rais View Post
I think killing scientists is a sad sad thing to do (waste of a useful resource) but it's probably a good way to go about it, cost/benefit wise.
How can you even consider writing such a thing!!!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 30-11-10, 06:05 PM
AnonymousIdiotSavant's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,089
Default

Because the bomb has a higher chance of success that they die, and requires less skill to use with 2 moving targets.

Far as killing innocent people, as if these scientists aren't innocent themselves, i've gotten the impression for a long time that Isreal only ever holds back on collateral damage out of PR reasons and not humanitarian ones.

Also, AFAIK this story hasn't been reported on yet here in the US... just the computer virus story so far.

Although the Wikileaks stuff about the Saudis and other Arab states pushing for us to "cut off the head of snake" in Iran has... and has gotten some people pissed off at the idea of the US being used to fight their wars.
__________________
Righteousness will always be the trap at the gates of hell
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 30-11-10, 09:08 PM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,639
Default

Originally Posted by Francois Cellier View Post
How can you even consider writing such a thing!!!
I am not sure I understand your outrage. Surely, the aim of sabotage etc is to deny the opponent capabilities. Bombing or infecting with viruses the iranian nuclear program infrastructure would achieve that. Eliminating the humans capable of using that infrastructure works as well.

Bombing would have serious consequences. Viruses are probably a temporary solution. Eliminating scientists is not a permanent solution either but I bet that it takes a heck of a lot of time and luck and money and training to churn out scientists bright enough to make headways in nuclear sciences.

As to whether we should deny nukes to Iran, I was far more tolerant a few years ago. Given GWB aggressive stance, it seemed logical enough for a country to want nukes. But the "we should wipe Israel off the map" and assorted comments plus the massive anti-democratic frauds of the regime have changed my mind - I no longer think the present Iranian regime can be trusted with nukes or that they would use it strictly for a MAD strategy. I think that, when they come under pressure and their fall will seem imminent, they might very well carry out acts of desperation. Thus, it seems reasonable to want to deprive them of nukes.
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 30-11-10, 09:16 PM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,639
Default

Originally Posted by AnonymousIdiotSavant View Post
Because the bomb has a higher chance of success that they die, and requires less skill to use with 2 moving targets.
I would imagine the cars were immobile. Columbian cartels were renowed for motorbikes executions, iirc.

Quote:
Far as killing innocent people, as if these scientists aren't innocent themselves...
They're working for the nuclear programme of a tyranical and religiously unhinged government. They are not innocent.

Quote:
... I've gotten the impression for a long time that Isreal only ever holds back on collateral damage out of PR reasons and not humanitarian ones.
As would any government or person in a position of power. But I am the target audience, I am rather well disposed to people stopping that program and it still annoys me that the wives got killed/injured. So, PR-wise, that's not very good.

Quote:
Although the Wikileaks stuff about the Saudis and other Arab states pushing for us to "cut off the head of snake" in Iran has... and has gotten some people pissed off at the idea of the US being used to fight their wars.
Well, so far, the US haven't really done anything so... I mean, sure, the Saudi are trying to goad the US into action but any nation will preach to its allies on what it thinks they ought to do for the best and, funnily enough, what it thinks is best will match its own national interests. People are funny that way...
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 30-11-10, 09:39 PM
contracycle's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,149
Default

Originally Posted by Gilles de Rais View Post
They're working for the nuclear programme of a tyranical and religiously unhinged government. They are not innocent.
Then everyone is guilty.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-10, 04:41 AM
AnonymousIdiotSavant's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,089
Default

Quote:
They're working for the nuclear programme of a tyranical and religiously unhinged government. They are not innocent.
Yeah... i'm looking back over the last 100 years of world history and i'm having problems coming up the number of times Iran has started a war (Iraq invaded Iran to start their war in 1980). Meanwhile, in the US...

The oppression and unhinged line is pretty overblown too IMO... at the very least you can't say they're any worse than Israel and nobody expects them to "set the gulf ablaze" even though they've said they would in the past.
__________________
Righteousness will always be the trap at the gates of hell
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-10, 10:06 AM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,639
Default

Originally Posted by AnonymousIdiotSavant View Post
Yeah... i'm looking back over the last 100 years of world history and i'm having problems coming up the number of times Iran has started a war.
You know what we say in Finance? "Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results"...

Quote:
The oppression and unhinged line is pretty overblown too IMO... at the very least you can't say they're any worse than Israel.
?! Since when Israel practises religious oppression and since when do they have a moral police monitoring people's dresses and behaviours? Since when Likoud refused to give up power after losing elections and threatened, arrested, killed and tortured members of the Labour opposition?

As I said, I used to think that Iran was alright because, for all its idiosyncracies and stupid religious outlook, it was more or less democratic. Not the way we feel democracy ought to be but it was democratic nonetheless. Israel wouldn't be the best example of democracy either but, hey, it's okay... But the ayatollahs and Ahmadinejad have clearly shown us the error of considering them reasonable. That they have some beef with Israel, I could conceive (although they're across the fucking Arabic Peninsula). That they resort to outright anti-semitism to maintain their population's commitment? Nah. Not acceptable. And, frankly, that's one big reason I don't like nearly all of the arabic states.
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
Reply


(View-All Members who have read this thread : 5
AnonymousIdiotSavant, contracycle, Francois Cellier, FredFredson, Gilles de Rais
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0