TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum  

Go Back   TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum » Main Forum » General & Current Events

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 25-09-10, 12:24 PM
Zichao's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,037
Default Lots of friends, so many enemies

Quote:
These should be the best of times for Mark Zuckerberg, the geeky genius behind the internet phenomenon of Facebook.

At 26, he has just shot up the Forbes rich list to 35th place with an estimated worth of $6.9 billion, his social networking site acquired its 500 millionth member this summer, and October's Vanity Fair has awarded him the number one slot in its annual New Establishment list.

And on Friday the normally media-shy Zuckerberg subjected himself to an appearance on The Oprah Winfrey Show to announce the biggest philanthropic donation of his short career – $100 million for state schools in the struggling New Jersey city of Newark.

The timing of this appearance may not have been coincidental, for a few hours later, Hollywood’s version of the Facebook story, The Social Network, had its world premiere in New York.

Given that the film portrays Zuckerberg as a scheming, back-stabbing outsider, motivated by romantic rejection and exclusion from the elite fraternities at Harvard university, he will have been keen to do what he could to divert attention from it.

The film also dwells on lawsuits brought against Zuckerberg by three fellow undergraduates, who alleged that he stole their idea and their codes after they employed him to write the program for their own Harvard social network website.

The trio – Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss, two square-jawed 6ft 5in identical twins who later studied at Oxford and rowed at the 2008 Olympics, and an Indian-American friend, Divya Narendra – appeared to have settled their long-running complaint for a reported $65 million two years ago.

But this year, they re-launched proceedings against Facebook for securities fraud, claiming that the company had overvalued the shares they were awarded as part of the deal. Facebook rejects the allegations.

Without doubt Facebook has helped transform how the world communicates. It has redefined social mores, established dramatic new online habits, introduced the concepts of “friending” and “de-friending” and delivered an ongoing lesson in the pitfalls of publishing personal information and photographs in a public forum.

Aspiring political careers have ended and job applications have been rejected because of inappropriate Facebook postings. And on the back of this flood of shared information the company has become wildly profitable – it is expected to generate revenues of $2 billion this year and is valued at a head-spinning $25 billion.

It will be for a Californian judge to reach a verdict in the fraud case.

But in the court of public opinion, Zuckerberg is about to take a pummelling thanks to his no-holds-barred portrayal in The Social Network, written by Aaron Sorkin (of The West Wing) and directed by David Fincher, best known for thrillers such as Panic Room and Zodiac.

For while Zuckerberg’s three rivals lost the social networking wars – they eventually gave up on their own site, ConnectU – it is the story of their betrayal that is at the heart of the plot.

The film stars a swath of 20-something actors whose youth and potential match their subject matter – among them Andrew Garfield, the 27-year-old Briton who will also be the lead in the new Spider-Man; his compatriot Max Minghella, 25, son of the late film director Anthony; pop star Justin Timberlake, a relative veteran at 29, as Sean Parker, Facebook’s first president; Jesse Eisenberg, 26, as Zuckerberg; and as his love interest, Mara Rooney, 25, who has just been chosen to star in Fincher’s next sure-fire hit, The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo.

There is already speculation in Hollywood that Garfield or Timberlake will be contenders for Oscar nominations as best supporting actor, alongside expected nods for best film, writer and director.

Unsurprisingly, this is not impressing Zuckerberg, who has told friends that he has no intention of watching a film marketed in posters and trailers with the line: “You don’t get to 500 million friends without making a few enemies”.

Tyler Winklevoss, who, thanks to the wonders of cinematic technology, will be played by the same actor as his brother, is excited about the film.

“Mark did not play by the rules,” he says. “He worked with us, he worked on our team, he was our partner. And then he defected in bad faith and sabotaged that relationship. I am glad this movie will show it’s not OK to behave like that.”

The Social Network has been criticised as a one-sided “fiction”. But director David Fincher insists: “This was never an attempt at character assassination. We are talking about what happened between one-time 19-year-old friends and something that is unimaginable to us – that what you talk about in your dorm room becomes worth $25 billion.”

The Winklevosses initially resisted the lure of becoming Facebook members themselves. But amid the attention of their sixth-place finish in the Beijing Olympics, and as they train for the London Games in 2012, they have succumbed.

“Facebook is ubiquitous and nobody is arguing that it isn’t a great tool,” Winklevoss says. “It was ridiculous for us not to take advantage of an idea we helped originate.”

Surprisingly, perhaps, David Fincher says he has never used Facebook. “I have seen it over people’s shoulders and I could see its addictive qualities, so I avoid it.”

If he did join, would he want to be a Facebook “friend” with Zuckerberg?

“I think he’s an endlessly fascinating character,” he says. “I still feel he’s the smartest guy in any room.”

Zuckerberg and his team declined to co-operate with the film, perhaps hoping that by ignoring it, they would avoid the feeding frenzy surrounding its release.

“It’s a sign of Facebook’s impact that we’re the subject of a movie – even one that’s fiction,” the company said in a statement released in the summer.

But as the anticipatory buzz intensified, Zuckerberg gave unprecedented access to a writer from the New Yorker magazine for a profile last week.

The character who emerged from the 6,000-word article was a mixture of reticent and cocksure. Acquaintances spoke of him as “a robot”, and a close friend said: “He’s been over-programmed”.

Of his management style at Facebook, another of his “closest friends” said: “Ultimately, it’s 'The Mark show’.”

Yet Rebecca O’Brien, a writer and Harvard contemporary of Zuckerberg, says the caricature of the self-obsessed geek versus the cool jocks is too simple.

“The characterisation that Mark was simply a crass, opportunistic jerk in college is overblown,” she says. “Did he make mistakes? Sure. And did he break agreements? It certainly seems so. He was obviously ambitious, but he also saw the potential and ran with it like nobody else could have done.

“The irony is that a very private person, who created a website founded on a platform of public disclosure, is now doing battle with the consequences of his actions in college.”

Zuckerberg is indeed about to be excoriated, on the big screen around the world, for his student deeds. It is the fate any Facebook user fears most.
Lots of friends, so many enemies - Telegraph

So... If I'm reading this correctly, he showed some initiative and turned your douchey little old boys' circle jerk into a global business, gave you $65m for doing sweet FA and you're still making bitch noises?

I have to say, that if he'd ripped off my code I'd just shrug and let it go rather than look like a whiny little crybaby in front of the whole world.
__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 26-09-10, 08:34 AM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,639
Default

Quote:
If I'm reading this correctly, he showed some initiative and turned your douchey little old boys' circle jerk into a global business, gave you $65m for doing sweet FA and you're still making bitch noises?

I have to say, that if he'd ripped off my code I'd just shrug and let it go rather than look like a whiny little crybaby in front of the whole world.
Stealing/ripping off the code of other people is not the kind of initiative we should be encouraging, is it?

OTOH, if their case of Mark Zuckerberg stealing from them had been airtight, they wouldn't have settled for mere $65mil. And I am surprised to hear that YOU wouldn't fight for the difference between $65mil and $6.9bil... You're going to need a bigger streetfighting mentality if you really want your yatch...

As to them doing sweet FA, that's true. But I wonder what Mark Zuckerberg really did. Something like Facebook just need to be thought up, get a "proof of concept" or some initial result to get some VCs interested and then that's it. It's a business that more or less take care of itself because it answered a need people didn't know they had but badly want to satisfy once they've been made aware of it. Mark Zuckerberg can then just sit back and relax and try to figure out how to make money out of 500 millions people with a free profile... That's not the hardest job to have...
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 26-09-10, 08:43 AM
Zichao's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,037
Default

Quote:
Stealing/ripping off the code of other people is not the kind of initiative we should be encouraging, is it?
I guess it's borderline. If someone has developped a non-patented vaccine against malaria and is using it to kill blackfly on his roses, would you steal that?

Quote:
OTOH, if their case of Mark Zuckerberg stealing from them had been airtight, they wouldn't have settled for mere $65mil. And I am surprised to hear that YOU wouldn't fight for the difference between $65mil and $6.9bil... You're going to need a bigger streetfighting mentality if you really want your yatch...
They're Harvard grads, so presumably they're not on the breadline. I'd just like to think that I'd rather have my dignity than spend the rest of my life getting fat on a windfall payment from the courts. If I was going to hit Zuckerberg up for cash it'd be more like, "Hey, Mark... Remember that code you stole from me back when we were secret gay lovers at university? Wonder what would happen if someone told the papers that story..?" Probably wouldn't get me the full $65m, but I'm not greedy.
__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-10-10, 03:36 PM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,639
Default

Mark Zuckerberg’s Most Valuable Friend

By MIGUEL HELFT
Published: October 2, 2010
PALO ALTO, Calif.

EVERY Monday a bit before 10 a.m., Sheryl Sandberg, Facebook’s chief operating officer, dashes off a quick e-mail to her boss, Mark Zuckerberg. “We have a routine,” Ms. Sandberg says. “I e-mail, ‘Coming in?’ He replies, ‘On my way.’ ”

A few minutes later, Mr. Zuckerberg, Facebook’s co-founder and chief executive, walks into the company’s headquarters here, says a few hellos and heads to a conference room where he and Ms. Sandberg huddle for an hour. The two executives end the week the same way, with a closed-door meeting on Friday afternoon. They discuss products, strategy, deals, personnel — and each other.

“We agreed that we would give each other feedback every Friday,” Ms. Sandberg says. “We are constantly flagging things. Nothing ever builds up.” At a recent meeting, for instance, they ironed out a disagreement between them over the details of Mr. Zuckerberg’s pledge to give $100 million to schools in Newark.

If all of that sounds a bit touchy-feely, well, it is. Ms. Sandberg, a well-regarded Internet executive, is known for her interpersonal skills as much as for her sharp intellect. And her regular meetings with the famously introverted Mr. Zuckerberg have helped to keep one of Silicon Valley’s most unusual business partnerships working wonders for Facebook.

Indeed, for a variety of reasons, Ms. Sandberg may well have become Mr. Zuckerberg’s most valuable friend.

Since Ms. Sandberg joined the company more than two years ago, Facebook has successfully navigated one of the more perilous stages in a start-up’s life: a period of hypergrowth. Facebook’s work force has expanded sixfold, to nearly 1,800, and its global audience has multiplied by more than seven, to half a billion. Revenue, once little more than an afterthought, is expected to balloon to around $1.6 billion this year, according to estimates from Wedbush Securities. (Facebook, a private company, doesn’t disclose its revenue.)

Part of the reason for that sales growth is Ms. Sandberg’s close ties to many of the world’s largest advertisers, relationships she first developed as a senior executive at Google. Ms. Sandberg also brought stability to Facebook, which had suffered from a long period of turmoil and the departure of several executives and early employees, including the company’s other co-founders.

“One of the reasons the company is doing so well is because the two of them get along so well,” says Mike Schroepfer, vice president for engineering.

Ms. Sandberg has focused on building the business, expanding internationally, cultivating relationships with large advertisers and putting her polish on things like communications and public policy. That has freed Mr. Zuckerberg to focus on what he likes best: the Facebook Web site and its platform.

Donald Graham, the chairman of the Washington Post Company, who once tried to hire Ms. Sandberg, says that in the last two years a lot of questions about Facebook’s viability have been put to rest.

“The combination of Mark and Sheryl is the primary reason,” says Mr. Graham, who is also a member of Facebook’s board.

These days, Ms. Sandberg is also juggling another duty: mounting a defense of Mr. Zuckerberg at a time when a new movie, “The Social Network,” portrays him as an aloof and conniving student who may have stolen the idea for Facebook from others. Ms. Sandberg will have none of that.

“He is shy and introverted and he often does not seem very warm to people who don’t know him, but he is warm,” Ms. Sandberg says of Mr. Zuckerberg, her voice rising with empathy. “He really cares about the people who work here.”

She can be just as protective of Mr. Zuckerberg in private.

At a technology conference this summer, for instance, Mr. Zuckerberg flopped during an onstage interview. He gave rambling answers to questions about Facebook’s privacy policies, became visibly nervous and started sweating profusely. After the interview, Ms. Sandberg encouraged him not to beat himself up over it, but to focus on parts of the interview that went well so he could do better next time, according to people briefed on their interaction who didn’t want to be identified because they were not authorized to discuss the matter.

“She really wants him to succeed,” says one of these people.

For all her achievements, there’s one area where Ms. Sandberg’s influence has yet to work its magic: privacy concerns. While Ms. Sandberg is not ultimately responsible for the features on the Facebook site — that’s Mr. Zuckerberg’s job — she is deeply involved in the planning that revolves around them. She readily acknowledges that Facebook has made mistakes.

“It is completely fair to say that we have had our challenges around privacy,” she says

Ms. Sandberg says that Facebook built powerful privacy controls, but that they became too complicated for the average user. Facebook recently simplified those settings. “Mark took the step to apologize,” about the privacy problems, she notes.

But some critics say the privacy issue goes beyond how easily users understand Facebook’s settings. For example, they note, Facebook collects increasing amounts of personal information from users to help marketers fine-tune their messages.

“I fear that Ms. Sandberg is failing to provide the adult supervision that Facebook requires,” says Jeff Chester, executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy, an advocacy group based in Washington. “Facebook’s direction regarding its use of its member data, and the viral and largely stealth marketing practices it endorses, is very disturbing.”

A spokesman for Facebook said the site lets users control what information they want to share and with whom, and makes it clear how the information may be used in its advertising products. Facebook never sells that information to third parties, the spokesman said.

Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg may well be Silicon Valley’s oddest couple. Mr. Zuckerberg, a 26-year-old engineer and product visionary, is socially awkward and reserved. At 41, Ms. Sandberg is the opposite: polished, personable, chatty and at ease in the limelight.

The differences don’t end there. Mr. Zuckerberg dropped out of Harvard after his sophomore year to focus on building Facebook, and has never worked anywhere else. Ms. Sandberg, who has a Harvard M.B.A., is a veteran of Google, where she had a central role in building the largest, most successful advertising business on the Internet.

By the time she left Google, her unit had grown from a handful of people to about 4,000 employees, or about one-quarter of Google’s total, and it accounted for more than half of the company’s revenue. She also helped to establish Google’s philanthropic arm and ran operations for a collection of unrelated projects, like Google’s book-scanning operations.

Eric Schmidt, Google’s chief executive, says he considers Ms. Sandberg to be a “superstar.” But there is growing tension between the two companies, in part because Ms. Sandberg has recruited a string of former Google executives and employees. About 200 ex-Googlers are now working at Facebook.

Before coming to Silicon Valley in 2001, Ms. Sandberg earned a degree in economics and then her M.B.A. from Harvard, did stints at the World Bank and at McKinsey & Company, and then worked as chief of staff for Lawrence H. Summers when he was Treasury secretary in the Clinton administration.

Despite their obvious differences — or maybe because of them — Mr. Zuckerberg and Ms. Sandberg have grown close. “A lot of people choose to hire people who look exactly like them,” Mr. Zuckerberg says. “Here we just value balance a lot more. It takes work to build those relationships, but if it does work, you end up with a much better system.”

Mr. Zuckerberg met Ms. Sandberg at a Christmas party in 2007, and they immediately took a liking to each other. What followed was an intense, six-week business courtship, during which the two dined together multiple times a week. Because both of them are Silicon Valley celebrities, they typically ate at Ms. Sandberg’s house so they could keep their talks confidential.

“We were very methodical and thoughtful about the relationship,” says Ms. Sandberg.

For his part, Mr. Zuckerberg, ever the tech geek, describes their interactions as “high-bandwidth.”

“We can talk for 30 seconds and have more meaning be exchanged than in a lot of meetings that I have for an hour,” he says. Ms. Sandberg might give him a quick update on, say, the development of Facebook’s offices in Ireland or India.

“I make sure that I understand the basic things that we are doing,” says Mr. Zuckerberg. But, he adds, he trusts that anything Ms. Sandberg handles will run smoothly. “The dynamic on the management team,” he says, “has improved a huge amount since she joined.”

Outside the company, Ms. Sandberg spends much of her time with advertisers. Last week, for example, she crisscrossed Manhattan, where she gave a keynote speech at an Advertising Week conference and met in private with various large advertisers.

Ms. Sandberg also oversees the seemingly arcane operational details that can help a company run smoothly — especially a company that is growing rapidly.

She recently sat down with Pedram Keyani, an engineer whose team builds the tools that handle complaints and requests from Facebook’s users. Mr. Keyani said Ms. Sandberg met with his small group to understand the challenges it faced, and later reorganized it to run more smoothly.

“She operates at every level,” Mr. Keyani says. “She’s good at strategy and dives deep and understands how teams work together.”

THE embrace of Ms. Sandberg by Mr. Zuckerberg and Facebook’s 20-something rank-and-file was not preordained. When she was hired, a frat-house atmosphere permeated the company, according to many early employees, and technology blogs speculated that she had been brought in to clean up the place.

To this day, Ms. Sandberg looks a bit out of place at Facebook. She sits in a cluster of desks that includes Mr. Zuckerberg’s as well as those of other engineering and product executives. Their penchant for jeans, T-shirts and hoodies is in sharp contrast to her taste for elegant clothing. Her own staff, which handles most of Facebook’s business functions, works in another building a few blocks away.

Her efforts to win over the Facebook troops began on her first day. She went desk to desk to introduce herself, cracking jokes and asking questions. It had the desired effect.

“She’s legit,” says Christopher Cox, a confidant of Mr. Zuckerberg and the company’s vice president for product. “She’s not like a robot M.B.A. The people who get rejected here are the people who come here and say all these M.B.A. words like ‘synergy.’ ”

Ms. Sandberg earned a reputation for mentoring many younger employees — especially women, encouraging many of them not to shy away from important roles simply because they were planning to start families. Ms. Sandberg can speak to that topic from experience: she is married to Dave Goldberg, the chief executive of SurveyMonkey, a maker of software for online surveys, and the couple have two young children.

Whenever anyone on her side of the company is promoted, she sends a congratulatory note.

People who have known Ms. Sandberg a long time say they are not surprised by her success. As a Harvard undergraduate, she sat near the back of an economics class taught by Mr. Summers. He says he didn’t pay much attention to her until she turned in the best midterm examination in her class — and then the best final.

Mr. Summers became her thesis adviser and later hired her to work with him at the World Bank and at the Treasury Department. Although she was still in her 20s, she played pivotal roles, like helping ramp up aid efforts to Africa by opening Treasury’s door to Bono of U2.

“I had never heard of him and said to Sheryl that I only meet with people who have a first name and last name,” Mr. Summers recalls. At Ms. Sandberg’s urging, he finally agreed. Debt relief in Africa “wouldn’t have happened if she hadn’t insisted I meet Bono and persevered on this issue,” says Mr. Summers.

MS. SANDBERG’S connection with Mr. Zuckerberg runs especially deep. The two often socialize, and Mr. Zuckerberg, who was captain of his high school fencing team, has taught Ms. Sandberg’s 5-year-old son a few fencing moves.

When Mr. Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan, his longtime girlfriend, started thinking about philanthropy, they turned to Ms. Sandberg. She immediately tapped her vast network of contacts and organized meetings with the likes of Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg of New York and Michelle A. Rhee, the schools chief in Washington, D.C.

Ms. Sandberg “helped me navigate the politics of it and to figure out where I could have the most leverage,” Mr. Zuckerberg says. “That she was the person that Priscilla and I turned to is a strong symbol of our relationship.”
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-10-10, 03:40 PM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,639
Default

Contra, if you read this article, I'd like to know how much you think Ms. Sandberg should be paid, from a Marxist point of view...
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
Reply


(View-All Members who have read this thread : 6
contracycle, Gilles de Rais, psyche, Zichao
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0