TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum  

Go Back   TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum » Main Forum » General & Current Events

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 26-07-10, 11:26 PM
LiberalNation's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: KY, USA
Posts: 1,199
Default Ultrasounds could lead to autism? U of L doctor sounds warning

Ultrasounds could lead to autism? U of L doctor sounds warning | WHAS11.com | Louisville news, Kentucky news & breaking news | WHAS11.com | News for Louisville, Kentucky

Louisville, Ky. (WHAS11) - A University of Louisville scientist who is making advances in autism research and treatment is sounding a new alarm.

Dr. Manuel Casanova believes something very common to all pregnant women may be contributing to the growing number of autism cases.

His reasons for sounding the alarm are both scientific and deeply personal.

WHAS11’s Melissa Swan has more on the research that expectant mothers might want to consider.

Nearly every pregnant woman gets an ultrasound - or two or three.

These days, parents post the pictures on websites; everything from YouTube, where you’ll find images of babies in-utero with background music, to their own personal blogsites.

In ultrasounds, high frequency sound waves get images of the baby, measurements are taken, abnormalities detected, and the sex of the baby is learned

Now, though, Dr. Manuel Casanova, a noted research scientist at the University of Louisville, is sounding a warning about ultrasounds.

“It's not just about taking a picture of your baby,” he said. “This has physical and chemical effects and it's poorly regulated by the government.”

Casanova published a report earlier this year in the journal “Medical Hypothesis,” spelling out his concerns of ultrasounds.

In it, he noted rising rates of autism coincident with the increased use of ultrasound in obstetrics, and demanded further research.

Currently it's thought that 1 in 110 children have some form of autism. Some of these cases have subtle characteristics, and others are more pronounced.

Dr. Casanova believes a mix of genetic and environmental factors has led to the rise in autism, and there is nothing now or even on the horizon that may stem that rise.

He thinks that ultrasounds are a risk factor that need to be looked at.

“Even if it doesn’t have anything to do with autism, it needs to be regulated,” he said.

Dr. Jeffrey King is the director of Maternal Fetal Medicine at U of L. He sees high risk pregnancies everyday and uses ultrasound technology. Click here to see Melissa's whole interview with Dr. King.

While he doesn't believe ultrasounds are related to autism, he also warned, they’re not a toy.

“Ultrasounds shouldn't be done just for fun,” Dr. King said. “There shouldn't be keepsake images done. There shouldn't be ultrasound done to take a look of the baby to tell you whether it's a boy or girl.”

Dr. Casanova admitted autism is not just a professional pursuit. For him, it's also a personal matter. His grandson is autistic.

Bertrand is Dr. Casanova's first grandchild. Until he was 18-months-old, Bertrand played, babbled, and developed normally.

Then, he was diagnosed with Retts Syndrome, a rare form of autism in which the development regresses.

Dr. Casanova began to sound his warning about ultrasounds after seeing photos of Bertrand at his daughter’s house.

“She had in her coffee table a book that summarizes my grandson's first year of life,” he said. “For every year we have pictures. The first picture, first page of that the first year of life, do you know what was his first picture? Ultrasound.”

Dr. Casanova is a scientist who relies on years of painstaking research to draw conclusions, but this time, he’s raising his concerns early .

“My daughter, when I told her about ultrasound, she told me ‘Why, Daddy, why didn't you tell me you always suspected it could be a risk factor? Why didn't you tell me?’” he said. “ I said, we have to be cautious. Right now maybe that has colored my perspective, and I’m not that cautious, but I know if I can prevent this even in one patient, I will have made my life's work.”

Clearly, the Dr. Casanova and Dr. King disagree, but they both say ultrasound should used only when medically necessary and then, ask a lot of questions.
__________________
Give unto Caesar that what is Caesar's, and lie like hell to keep as much of the rest of your shit as you can.

"If you want something said ask a man...if you want something done, ask a woman" Margaret Thatcher
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 26-07-10, 11:48 PM
Zichao's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,037
Default

Originally Posted by LiberalNation View Post
Dr. Casanova is a scientist who relies on years of painstaking research to draw conclusions, but this time, he’s raising his concerns early .

“My daughter, when I told her about ultrasound, she told me ‘Why, Daddy, why didn't you tell me you always suspected it could be a risk factor? Why didn't you tell me?’” he said. “ I said, we have to be cautious. Right now maybe that has colored my perspective, and I’m not that cautious, but I know if I can prevent this even in one patient, I will have made my life's work.”

Clearly, the Dr. Casanova and Dr. King disagree, but they both say ultrasound should used only when medically necessary and then, ask a lot of questions.
Ah, the elegant simplicity of the scientific method!

1. Raise hypothesis based on no evidence whatsoever.
2. Provoke panic and emotive babbling among immediate family.
3. Consider hypothesis proved.
4. Spread panic as far as possible.
__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 26-07-10, 11:52 PM
LiberalNation's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: KY, USA
Posts: 1,199
Default

lol but it came from UofL, one of our doctors actually made the news. This is good publicity.
__________________
Give unto Caesar that what is Caesar's, and lie like hell to keep as much of the rest of your shit as you can.

"If you want something said ask a man...if you want something done, ask a woman" Margaret Thatcher
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 27-07-10, 12:10 AM
Noir's Avatar
Je suis Morrissey
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Wee Norn Iron
Posts: 324
Send a message via MSN to Noir
Default

Even *if* there is a link, are Ultra-sounds not used to check for many possible health problems with unborn babies?
If so, and there is no alternitive, then autism maybe a most unwanted but required risk.
__________________
"Bored of what scares me, and scared of what bores me."
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 27-07-10, 06:56 AM
Benjamin's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SW Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,312
Default

It's an interesting hypothesis because it's plausible there is a correlation between increased use of ultrasound and increased incidence of autism.

And it should never have been given to the media before an investigation.
__________________
"Neither man nor nation can exist without a sublime idea."
Fyodor Dostoyevsky, 1821 - 1881
QOTD

My BLOG: Things Have Changed
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 27-07-10, 09:44 AM
contracycle's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,149
Default

Ceretainly some sort of universal or near-universal influence is likely to be the right sort of thing to be looking at to find the cause of the increase of incidence in autism; but this sort of speculation without proper backing is what got Andrew Wakefield struck off for serious misconduct after linking it to the MMR vaccine.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 27-07-10, 12:15 PM
Zichao's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,037
Default

I haven't done any research, but my money's on:

1. The medicalisation of everything. A little bit odd? Have a Latin name and an article in the Lancet.
2. Autism sounds better than "sorry your kid's a bit spazzy, sometimes they just turn out that way".
__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 27-07-10, 12:47 PM
contracycle's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,149
Default

Well in that case medicalisaation is an improvement, becuase it leads to formal diagnoses and treatments; thats a step forward on "sucks to be you".

Last I read there have been studies looking at whether improved detection accounts for the rise, concluding that it did not.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 27-07-10, 12:53 PM
Zichao's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,037
Default

Originally Posted by contracycle View Post
Well in that case medicalisaation is an improvement, becuase it leads to formal diagnoses and treatments; thats a step forward on "sucks to be you".
It's an improvement when what's being medicalised can/should be helped with formal treaments, and as long as it doesn't have a negative effect on those being medicalised, sure.
__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 27-07-10, 03:08 PM
insignificant data point
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,799
Default

Quote:
Last I read there have been studies looking at whether improved detection accounts for the rise, concluding that it did not.
Links?
Reply With Quote
Reply


(View-All Members who have read this thread : 9
bateman, Benjamin, contracycle, Gilles de Rais, LiberalNation, Noir, psyche, roadkill, Zichao
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0