TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum  

Go Back   TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum » Main Forum » General & Current Events

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 23-07-10, 12:25 PM
contracycle's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,149
Default Health gap 'wider than in Great Depression'

Health gap 'wider than in Great Depression'
By Nick Triggle Health reporter, BBC News


The health inequality gap in Britain is greater than it was during the post-World War I slump and the Great Depression, a study suggests.

Despite the continued rise in life expectancy, it is well documented that the gap between richest and poorest has actually been widening in recent years.

Researchers from Sheffield and Bristol looked at early death rates since 1921.

They found the current gap was greater than it was in the 1920s and 1930s, the British Medical Journal reports.

The researchers analysed mortality data for England and Wales, obtained from the Office for National Statistics, and for Scotland, obtained from the General Register Office for Scotland.

Between 1999 to 2007, for every 100 deaths before the age of 65 in the richest 10th of areas, there were 212 in the poorest 10th.

This compared with 191 deaths in the poorest areas from 1921 to 1930 and 185 deaths from 1931 to 1939.

These decades cover probably the toughest economic and social period of the 20th century.

The UK spent the 1920s struggling to recover from WWI and was then caught up in the Great Depression of the following decade which was sparked by 1929 stock market crash in the US.

From that period onwards health inequalities started narrowing until the 1970s, the analysis showed.

Researchers said this was mainly due to the boom in manufacturing in the traditionally poorer parts of Britain.

But since then the gap has widened, particularly during the last 20 years.

This means that the pledge by the previous Labour government to reduce the inequality gap between 1997 and 2010 is almost certain to be missed.

Lead researcher Professor Danny Dorling said the findings were a "stark reminder" of the challenge facing the nation.

"Health and wealth are directly linked and, unless we tackle the income gap, we could well see life expectancy actually starting to fall for the first time in the poorest areas."

Professor Sir Michael Marmot, a leading health inequalities expert who has advised both the government and World Health Organization, said: "There are two major challenges: to improve health for everybody and to reduce inequalities. In Britain, we have done well on the first - not on the second.

"This should not be taken as a counsel of despair. Over the last decade, life expectancy for the bottom quarter of the population increased significantly, but their health did not catch up with the average, because of persisting social and economic inequalities."

BBC News - Health gap 'wider than in Great Depression'
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 23-07-10, 03:11 PM
insignificant data point
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,799
Default

These are nonsensical statistics.

Quote:
Between 1999 to 2007, for every 100 deaths before the age of 65 in the richest 10th of areas, there were 212 in the poorest 10th.

This compared with 191 deaths in the poorest areas from 1921 to 1930 and 185 deaths from 1931 to 1939.
The gap that is complained of may exist but these numbers do not tell us one way or the other what is actually going on. What we need to see is the age-mortality distribution over time. Has life expectancy for the poorest people decreased? If it has increased, how much less has it increased than for the rich? If there is a difference, as apparently there is, is it due to the operation of the National Health System or fast food outlets or some other cause, or a combination of the above?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 23-07-10, 03:17 PM
Zichao's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,037
Default

Also, poor people live more squashed up than rich ones. You need to factor in the population density.
__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 23-07-10, 03:36 PM
insignificant data point
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,799
Default

Only the Squashed Die Young?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 23-07-10, 08:06 PM
contracycle's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,149
Default

Originally Posted by roadkill View Post
These are nonsensical statistics.

The gap that is complained of may exist but these numbers do not tell us one way or the other what is actually going on.
Maybe thats becuase the study is only looking to see if there is a gap? You'd have to do other investigations to determine what the cause is. This does not make the results "nonsensical".
Reply With Quote
Reply


(View-All Members who have read this thread : 5
contracycle, Gilles de Rais, LiberalNation, roadkill, Zichao
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0