TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum  

Go Back   TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum » Main Forum » General & Current Events

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 21-07-10, 03:48 PM
contracycle's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,149
Default Animal Connection: New Hypothesis for Human Evolution and Human Nature

Animal Connection: New Hypothesis for Human Evolution and Human Nature

ScienceDaily (July 20, 2010) — It's no secret to any dog-lover or cat-lover that humans have a special connection with animals. But in a new journal article and forthcoming book, paleoanthropologist Pat Shipman of Penn State University argues that this human-animal connection goes well beyond simple affection. Shipman proposes that the interdependency of ancestral humans with other animal species -- "the animal connection" -- played a crucial and beneficial role in human evolution over the last 2.6 million years.

"Establishing an intimate connection to other animals is unique and universal to our species," said Shipman, a professor of biological anthropology. Her paper describing the new hypothesis for human evolution based on the tendency to nurture members of other species will be published in the August 2010 issue of the journal Current Anthropology.

In addition to describing her theory in the scientific paper, Shipman has authored a book for the general public, now in press with W. W. Norton, titled The Animal Connection. "No other mammal routinely adopts other species in the wild -- no gazelles take in baby cheetahs, no mountain lions raise baby deer," Shipman said. "Every mouthful you feed to another species is one that your own children do not eat. On the face of it, caring for another species is maladaptive, so why do we humans do this?"

Shipman suggests that the animal connection was prompted by the invention of stone tools 2.6-million years ago. "Having sharp tools transformed wimpy human ancestors into effective predators who left many cut marks on the fossilized bones of their prey," Shipman said. Becoming a predator also put our ancestors into direct competition with other carnivores for carcasses and prey. As Shipman explains, the human ancestors who learned to observe and understand the behavior of potential prey obtained more meat. "Those who also focused on the behavior of potential competitors reaped a double evolutionary advantage for natural selection," she said.

Over time, Shipman explains, the volume of information about animals increased, the evolutionary benefits of communicating this knowledge to others increased, and language evolved as an external means of handling and communicating information through symbols. "Though we cannot discover the earliest use of language itself, we can learn something from the earliest prehistoric art with unambiguous content. Nearly all of these artworks depict animals. Other potentially vital topics -- edible plants, water, tools or weapons, or relationships among humans -- are rarely if ever shown," Shipman said. She sees this disproportion as evidence that the evolutionary pressure to develop an external means of storing and transmitting information -- symbolic language -- came primarily from the animal connection.

Shipman concludes that detailed information about animals became so advantageous that our ancestors began to nurture wild animals -- a practice that led to the domestication of the dog about 32,000 years ago. She argues that, if insuring a steady supply of meat was the point of domesticating animals, as traditionally has been assumed, then dogs would be a very poor choice as an early domesticated species. "Why would you take a ferocious animal like a wolf, bring it into your family and home, and think this was advantageous?" Shipman asks. "Wolves eat so much meat themselves that raising them for food would be a losing proposition."

Shipman suggests, instead, that the primary impetus for domestication was to transform animals we had been observing intently for millennia into living tools during their peak years, then only later using their meat as food. "As living tools, different domestic animals offer immense renewable resources for tasks such as tracking game, destroying rodents, protecting kin and goods, providing wool for warmth, moving humans and goods over long distances, and providing milk to human infants" she said.

Domestication, she explained, is a process that takes generations and puts selective pressure on abilities to observe, empathize, and communicate across species barriers. Once accomplished, the domestication of animals offers numerous advantages to those with these attributes. "The animal connection is an ancient and fundamentally human characteristic that has brought our lineage huge benefits over time," Shipman said. "Our connection with animals has been intimately involved with the evolution of two key human attributes -- tool making and language -- and with constructing the powerful ecological niche now held by modern humans."

Animal connection: New hypothesis for human evolution and human nature
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 22-07-10, 12:26 AM
Benjamin's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SW Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,312
Default

The initial leap of domestication was taken by the dogs, who learned that if they put up with being in our proximity about all the time, they gained chances to grab yummy scraps and garbage. Then we figured out ways to teach stuff to these dogs that were around all the time. This led to coevolution where they specialized in smelling things for us, leaving us for more brain for looking, and throwing things at stuff.
__________________
"Neither man nor nation can exist without a sublime idea."
Fyodor Dostoyevsky, 1821 - 1881
QOTD

My BLOG: Things Have Changed
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 22-07-10, 08:08 AM
contracycle's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,149
Default

Yeah there are things that bother me about this proposition. For example, while I agree with the dogs-colonising-humans argument, there is also the idea that humans benefit defensively from dogs senses, especially at night, which may well be a benefit worth paying for in meat. After all even today dogs and other animals are frequently portrayed as sensing ghosts and supernatural threats etc; the idea that they are especially aware of dangers that are otherwise invisible is quite deeply entrenched.

Plus, this argument seems to say that humans had to develop a theory of mind that included other animals as a result of the needs of hunting, but if that is true, shouldn't it also be true for, say, lions? I would think it would be more plausible to see the relationship as running the other way; that with a theory of mind based in our primate evolution, we were able to extend it to understanding animals that became viable prey through the development of tools. In that case it is this innate theory of mind which is the main factor in our ability to create emotional relationships with pets etc.

The argument that knowledge about animals needed to be communicated and so provided a motive and subject for the develoment of language I'm more willing to buy.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 22-07-10, 03:13 PM
Benjamin's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SW Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,312
Default

Size of brain. We did more with dogs than lions have done with jackals because we're smarter. More generally, that's why we developed the ability to create abstract knowledge about prey animal behavior. It may be that that particular subject of study drove both the development of abstract thought, and the development of language to communicate it.

I've yet to hear a theory of why we're smarter that I like better than the idea that it was driven by the need to quickly calculate when to let go of the rock, in order to throw accurately. That particular thing we do is computationally very demanding. Though of course any behavior that is survuval-enhancing and brain-intensive will select for bigger brains.
__________________
"Neither man nor nation can exist without a sublime idea."
Fyodor Dostoyevsky, 1821 - 1881
QOTD

My BLOG: Things Have Changed
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 22-07-10, 04:01 PM
contracycle's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,149
Default

Baboons throw stones; it's one of the things that makes them quite hazardous (the other is the ZOMG FANGS!). But I don't know how accurate they are; one of those things it would be difficult to test I imagine. While humans are known to have been able to knock birds out of the sky.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 22-07-10, 07:07 PM
Benjamin's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SW Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,312
Default

I used to have a link to an essay that went into the computational demands of throwing. The thing is, accurate throwing requires to-the-millisecond timing on when you release the missile as you swing your arm. The big problem is that nueron speed, both in the head and then down to the arm to command release, is way slow compared to the accuracy needed. So, the brain has to go massively parallel to solve the problem with enough lead-time to get the signals down to the arm (where the tendons are that control the hand) at the right millesecond.

Evolution-wise, once we started getting food by throwing things at it, we had a feedback loop where incremental improvements in accuracy and distance were selected-for. So, every increment in bigger and better computers was conserved. This, the theory holds, is why hominid brains get huge 'all of a sudden' in the fossil record.

Developing the ability to talk to our social comrades also sets up a similar feedback loop, but it seems like throwing is much older, and is what provided the basic equipment for other brain-intensive tasks.
__________________
"Neither man nor nation can exist without a sublime idea."
Fyodor Dostoyevsky, 1821 - 1881
QOTD

My BLOG: Things Have Changed
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 22-07-10, 07:50 PM
FredFredson's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: North America
Posts: 1,749
Default

Quote:
"Establishing an intimate connection to other animals is unique and universal to our species," said Shipman, a professor of biological anthropology. Her paper describing the new hypothesis for human evolution based on the tendency to nurture members of other species will be published in the August 2010 issue of the journal Current Anthropology.
That "intimate connection" also exists for non-domesticated animals as well. Our ancient ancestors lived in much closer contact with all animals and plants in their environments. Just looking at the cave paintings one sees evidence of a much closer understanding of the beasts around us. This is also reflected in legend and the remains of pre-historic religious systems.

Frankly I think the sudden growth of our cognitive abilities that Benjamin alludes to above brought a whole slew of abilities along for the ride, including empathy and the ability to hold a complete world view that includes the "other", human or not, as an integral part of that world view.

F
__________________
"Patriotism means being loyal to your country all the time and to its government when it deserves it."-- Mark Twain

"Inter arma silent Musae"--when the weapons speak, the muses fall silent.

An't nanum hearm deth, doth hwaet ye willath.

It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished
unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets. -Voltaire

Economic Left/Right: -3.88
Authoritarian/Libertarian: -4.36
Reply With Quote
Reply


(View-All Members who have read this thread : 6
Benjamin, contracycle, Francois Cellier, FredFredson, roadkill, Zichao
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0