TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum  

Go Back   TheNewTopical.com - current events, politics, culture, ethics, economics discussion forum » Main Forum » Culture

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-06-11, 08:30 PM
Zichao's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,037
Default Selection from the Venice biennale

Venice Biennale 2011 art festival in pictures - Telegraph

I like: the Japanese guy and Anish Kapoor and Graud's luminous ball and fake trees.
I'm irritated by: whoever the hell decided that having assinine sixth-form politics was somehow art. Allora and Calzadilla's tank for instance. It's like totally sticking it to the man, and why we should give a shit I haven't the foggiest idea. I think the Swiss guy's stuff is derivitive, but so many people have done basically the same thing that it's impossible to tell who it's derivitive of.

I didn't actually dislike anything (well, the Swiss guy's stuff, yes, maybe - he's ripping off an idea that wasn't even very interesting to start with), but very often my main reaction was "Well yeah, but so what?" You get the feeling that a lot of people are just filling a space rather than making something that they want to show off to people.
__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-11, 10:56 PM
Zichao's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,037
Default

Sorry, I've been working on a bunch of contemporary art stuff lately so I'm kind of immersed in it. I realise that 99% of people can't stand 99% of it.

At the moment I like: WILKINSON

Laurie Simmons - she poses real dolls so that they're sitting around in appartments. It's supposed to be something to do with the commodification of sexuality or some such trite, sixthform hogwash, but that's not why I like it. I like it because I'd never considered real dolls as art before, and this made me realise how beautiful they are. The guy designing these things deserves a prize - that girl in the box is far better and more lifelike than, say, the Venus of Cnidos. Obviously Praxiteles gets a million extra points for working without CAD and standards at the time were different, but seriously, look at her.
__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-06-11, 07:20 AM
contracycle's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,149
Default

Originally Posted by Zichao View Post
It's supposed to be something to do with the commodification of sexuality or some such trite, sixthform hogwash
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-06-11, 08:56 AM
Zichao's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,037
Default

Well it's true. I could say the same thing about La Grande Odalisque or any of the 10,000 variations on the rape of the Sabine women or basically any picture that has a naked chick in it. Who even cares? They're just pretty pictures.
__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-06-11, 09:37 AM
contracycle's Avatar
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,149
Default

No you couldn't. Seems to me your position amounts to saying "I can't be bothered to understand this so I'll just mock it". Which is really reminiscent of the sixth form?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-06-11, 11:19 AM
Zichao's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,037
Default

I think "can't be bothered" is a perfectly reasonable position here. What will a detailed knowledge of Laurie Simmons' opinions on the commodification of sex bring to my life? Certainly quantifiably less pleasure than looking at a pretty girl and thinking how pretty she is. Of course, should I go on Who Wants to be a Millionnaire and get Laurie Simmons' views on sexuality as a final question I'll regret this decision, but it seems rather unlikely.
__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-06-11, 08:33 AM
Zichao's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,037
Default

Venice Biennale: In every pavilion, a parallel universe - Telegraph

Quote:
There are always new artists to discover at the Venice Biennale, but usually you find them in the group show at the Arsenale or in some godforsaken palazzo way off the beaten track. This year, the work that impressed me most was shown in the national pavilions of Great Britain, Germany and Japan – in each of which the artist created a world-within-a-world, immersing visitors in a parallel universe and sweeping them up in the intensity of the artist’s imaginative vision. Last week, the artists who showed in those pavilions were almost unknown outside their own countries; by the time the awards were announced on Saturday word of mouth had made three of them famous. Germany won the Golden Lion, but for my money all three were worthy of the big award.

Mike Nelson’s show – which I reviewed last week – transformed the delightful interior of the British Pavilion into a place where nothing good could ever happen. Using architectural fragments and found objects he salvaged from skips and junkyards in Istanbul and Venice, he rebuilt the interior, turning it into a place of dispossession and dangerous alienation. Harsh neon lighting, dirty mattresses and filthy blankets, rags covering television sets that are never turned off; empty petrol tins, broken furniture and rusty tools scattered on wooden tables: everywhere you looked, there was dirt and despair.

When the artist, filmmaker and theatre director Christoph Schlingensief created the installation being shown in the German pavilion in 2008, he already knew he was dying from lung cancer. A Church of Fear vs. the Alien Within is a life-size replica of the Catholic church where he been an altar boy during his childhood. In effect, what we see is a theatre set against which Schlingensief stages a “performance” of his life and approaching death.

We sit in pews facing the altar watching excerpts from home movies showing the artist in childhood juxtaposed with X-rays of the lungs that would kill him. A monstrance, where in a real church, the eucharist would be displayed, contains a photo of a cancer cell. Films projected on both side walls of the “church” chronicle a journey from innocence to experience and from health to physical deterioration.

After snatches of Wagner and the Ave Maria, we hear the artist speaking of his terror of death, before breaking down in tears. Some may find this operatic theatricality excessive. It moved me as few works of art ever have.

Whatever his belief (or lack of it) as an adult, Schlingensief is looking back on his life and facing his death in the only way he knows how – by filtering both through a religious imagination he internalised as a child. The piece acknowledges the complexity of faith as both alienating and oppressive but also a gift that he connects with art and music and his visionary work in education and public health in Africa.

Many colleagues told me that their favourite pavilion was Japan’s, where the young artist Tabaimo showed hand-drawn animations on mirrored walls in a small enclosed space. Drawing on an aesthetic somewhere between Hokusai and Walt Disney, she was like the Sorcerer’s Apprentice, waving a magic wand to fill the gallery with breaking waves and blooming flowers as infinite space opened up beneath our feet or over our heads.

If that sounds confusing, it was. Because it was impossible for the mind to understand what the eye was seeing, I found myself fixed to one spot, unable to determine except through touch where the real walls and floor stopped and the animated and mirrored ones began. Lord knows what it all meant – but who cares, it was great.

The rest of the biennale wasn’t bad, either. Turning the interior of the French Pavilion into a sort of clanking conveyer belt made out of scaffolding, Christian Boltanski processed pictures of newborn infants through a projector in such a way that a part of each baby’s face appeared for a few split seconds on a far wall juxtaposed with the eyes, nose or mouth of an adult. His point was simple but profound: that the genes we are born with by sheer chance determine not only our appearance and intelligence, but everything else about our lives, including our capacity for happiness.

After seeing it, I sat in a café watching biennale-goers pass by. What struck me was how unaware we all are that beauty, brains, prosperity and good fortune are not of our own doing. The gift or curse that God or nature bestows at random is lifetime membership of or exclusion from the lucky sperm club.

At the pavilion of the United States, Jennifer Allora and Guillermo Calzadilla’s Track and Field consisted of an overturned Centurion MK3 tank on which an athlete dressed in red, white and blue was jogging on a running machine attached to the tank’s massive caterpillar tracks, making them move and creating a din you could hear all over the public gardens. Inside the pavilion, Olympic gymnasts performed specially commissioned routines on scale model replicas of business class airline seats, contrasting the vibrancy and beauty of the human body in movement with the immobility and inertia of corporate and military thinking.

Also terrific was the Israeli Pavilion, with its film of three young man men armed with knives playing a game in which each drew a line in the sand which was instantly erased and then redrawn by each of the others in turn – a neat summing up of that hopeless, chronic and unsolvable political situation. Poland showed a film by an Israeli artist which called for the three million Polish Jews who were exterminated with the enthusiastic co-operation of their fellow countrymen in the Holocaust to be replaced with a new wave of Jewish settlers. I found its language and its ideas dodgy in the extreme.

By tradition the group show in the former Italian Pavilion is curated by the director of the visual arts section. This year it was a mistake to open the show with three of Tintoretto’s most cherished paintings, including the sublime Stealing of the Body of St Mark from the Academia. There are certainly contemporary artists who can bear comparison with the greatest Old Masters, but none of them turned up in the show that followed – a point I thought rather neatly made by the Italian Maurizio Cattelan who placed flocks of highly realistic stuffed pigeons in the rafters and piles of fake pigeon poo on the floors as a comment on the proceedings.

At the group show in the former rope factory, or Cordiere, at the Arsenale, the stand-out exhibit was Christian Marclay’s The Clock – the 24- hour time piece in which every minute of every hour is either seen or mentioned in a film clip or clips that flash on the screen for that minute, which was better than ever when watched from a comfortable couch.

I arrived at 11.45am and so spent 15 of the happiest minutes of the whole biennale waiting to see which film would appear when the clock struck noon – and sure enough, there he was, Gary Cooper doing what a man has to do as the little hand moved to High Noon. Marclay was presented with the Golden Lion for the best artist in the exhibition.

Also outstanding was Nick Relph’s technically complex three-channel film about the art of Ellsworth Kelly, in which he used collage, colour filters and drawings to do on film what Kelly did with paper, scissors and paint. I’m a big fan of Nurse Jackie and so grabbed the chance to watch the second instalment of Nathaniel Mellors’s Ourhouse, a hilarious parody of a television soap opera about a dysfunctional (but arty) family.

In the Scottish Pavilion (outside the official exhibition spaces), Karla Black staged an ambitious show of work made of paper and string and stuck together with glue and Sellotape. Black, who has been nominated for the Turner Prize this year, tries to paint on air and sculpt with materials that look as if they could float away at any minute.

The jury gave a Silver Lion for the most promising young artist to the British sculptor Haroon Mirza, who showed a menacing black triangular box in which the viewer stood to watch a circle of white LED lights illuminate for a moment, then click off, leaving us with an after image of white loops dancing before our eyes.
Venice Biennale: In every pavilion, a parallel universe - Telegraph
__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 08-06-11, 08:34 AM
Zichao's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,037
Default

Venice Biennale: In every pavilion, a parallel universe - Telegraph

Quote:
There are always new artists to discover at the Venice Biennale, but usually you find them in the group show at the Arsenale or in some godforsaken palazzo way off the beaten track. This year, the work that impressed me most was shown in the national pavilions of Great Britain, Germany and Japan – in each of which the artist created a world-within-a-world, immersing visitors in a parallel universe and sweeping them up in the intensity of the artist’s imaginative vision. Last week, the artists who showed in those pavilions were almost unknown outside their own countries; by the time the awards were announced on Saturday word of mouth had made three of them famous. Germany won the Golden Lion, but for my money all three were worthy of the big award.

Mike Nelson’s show – which I reviewed last week – transformed the delightful interior of the British Pavilion into a place where nothing good could ever happen. Using architectural fragments and found objects he salvaged from skips and junkyards in Istanbul and Venice, he rebuilt the interior, turning it into a place of dispossession and dangerous alienation. Harsh neon lighting, dirty mattresses and filthy blankets, rags covering television sets that are never turned off; empty petrol tins, broken furniture and rusty tools scattered on wooden tables: everywhere you looked, there was dirt and despair.

When the artist, filmmaker and theatre director Christoph Schlingensief created the installation being shown in the German pavilion in 2008, he already knew he was dying from lung cancer. A Church of Fear vs. the Alien Within is a life-size replica of the Catholic church where he been an altar boy during his childhood. In effect, what we see is a theatre set against which Schlingensief stages a “performance” of his life and approaching death.

We sit in pews facing the altar watching excerpts from home movies showing the artist in childhood juxtaposed with X-rays of the lungs that would kill him. A monstrance, where in a real church, the eucharist would be displayed, contains a photo of a cancer cell. Films projected on both side walls of the “church” chronicle a journey from innocence to experience and from health to physical deterioration.

After snatches of Wagner and the Ave Maria, we hear the artist speaking of his terror of death, before breaking down in tears. Some may find this operatic theatricality excessive. It moved me as few works of art ever have.

Whatever his belief (or lack of it) as an adult, Schlingensief is looking back on his life and facing his death in the only way he knows how – by filtering both through a religious imagination he internalised as a child. The piece acknowledges the complexity of faith as both alienating and oppressive but also a gift that he connects with art and music and his visionary work in education and public health in Africa.

Many colleagues told me that their favourite pavilion was Japan’s, where the young artist Tabaimo showed hand-drawn animations on mirrored walls in a small enclosed space. Drawing on an aesthetic somewhere between Hokusai and Walt Disney, she was like the Sorcerer’s Apprentice, waving a magic wand to fill the gallery with breaking waves and blooming flowers as infinite space opened up beneath our feet or over our heads.

If that sounds confusing, it was. Because it was impossible for the mind to understand what the eye was seeing, I found myself fixed to one spot, unable to determine except through touch where the real walls and floor stopped and the animated and mirrored ones began. Lord knows what it all meant – but who cares, it was great.

The rest of the biennale wasn’t bad, either. Turning the interior of the French Pavilion into a sort of clanking conveyer belt made out of scaffolding, Christian Boltanski processed pictures of newborn infants through a projector in such a way that a part of each baby’s face appeared for a few split seconds on a far wall juxtaposed with the eyes, nose or mouth of an adult. His point was simple but profound: that the genes we are born with by sheer chance determine not only our appearance and intelligence, but everything else about our lives, including our capacity for happiness.

After seeing it, I sat in a café watching biennale-goers pass by. What struck me was how unaware we all are that beauty, brains, prosperity and good fortune are not of our own doing. The gift or curse that God or nature bestows at random is lifetime membership of or exclusion from the lucky sperm club.

At the pavilion of the United States, Jennifer Allora and Guillermo Calzadilla’s Track and Field consisted of an overturned Centurion MK3 tank on which an athlete dressed in red, white and blue was jogging on a running machine attached to the tank’s massive caterpillar tracks, making them move and creating a din you could hear all over the public gardens. Inside the pavilion, Olympic gymnasts performed specially commissioned routines on scale model replicas of business class airline seats, contrasting the vibrancy and beauty of the human body in movement with the immobility and inertia of corporate and military thinking.

Also terrific was the Israeli Pavilion, with its film of three young man men armed with knives playing a game in which each drew a line in the sand which was instantly erased and then redrawn by each of the others in turn – a neat summing up of that hopeless, chronic and unsolvable political situation. Poland showed a film by an Israeli artist which called for the three million Polish Jews who were exterminated with the enthusiastic co-operation of their fellow countrymen in the Holocaust to be replaced with a new wave of Jewish settlers. I found its language and its ideas dodgy in the extreme.

By tradition the group show in the former Italian Pavilion is curated by the director of the visual arts section. This year it was a mistake to open the show with three of Tintoretto’s most cherished paintings, including the sublime Stealing of the Body of St Mark from the Academia. There are certainly contemporary artists who can bear comparison with the greatest Old Masters, but none of them turned up in the show that followed – a point I thought rather neatly made by the Italian Maurizio Cattelan who placed flocks of highly realistic stuffed pigeons in the rafters and piles of fake pigeon poo on the floors as a comment on the proceedings.

At the group show in the former rope factory, or Cordiere, at the Arsenale, the stand-out exhibit was Christian Marclay’s The Clock – the 24- hour time piece in which every minute of every hour is either seen or mentioned in a film clip or clips that flash on the screen for that minute, which was better than ever when watched from a comfortable couch.

I arrived at 11.45am and so spent 15 of the happiest minutes of the whole biennale waiting to see which film would appear when the clock struck noon – and sure enough, there he was, Gary Cooper doing what a man has to do as the little hand moved to High Noon. Marclay was presented with the Golden Lion for the best artist in the exhibition.

Also outstanding was Nick Relph’s technically complex three-channel film about the art of Ellsworth Kelly, in which he used collage, colour filters and drawings to do on film what Kelly did with paper, scissors and paint. I’m a big fan of Nurse Jackie and so grabbed the chance to watch the second instalment of Nathaniel Mellors’s Ourhouse, a hilarious parody of a television soap opera about a dysfunctional (but arty) family.

In the Scottish Pavilion (outside the official exhibition spaces), Karla Black staged an ambitious show of work made of paper and string and stuck together with glue and Sellotape. Black, who has been nominated for the Turner Prize this year, tries to paint on air and sculpt with materials that look as if they could float away at any minute.

The jury gave a Silver Lion for the most promising young artist to the British sculptor Haroon Mirza, who showed a menacing black triangular box in which the viewer stood to watch a circle of white LED lights illuminate for a moment, then click off, leaving us with an after image of white loops dancing before our eyes.
Venice Biennale: In every pavilion, a parallel universe - Telegraph
__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 08-06-11, 08:42 AM
Zichao's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,037
Default

Quote:
Using architectural fragments and found objects he salvaged from skips and junkyards in Istanbul and Venice, he rebuilt the interior, turning it into a place of dispossession and dangerous alienation. Harsh neon lighting, dirty mattresses and filthy blankets, rags covering television sets that are never turned off; empty petrol tins, broken furniture and rusty tools scattered on wooden tables: everywhere you looked, there was dirt and despair.
Well okay, it does look pretty good, but the Saw franchise did that too.

Quote:
At the pavilion of the United States, Jennifer Allora and Guillermo Calzadilla’s Track and Field consisted of an overturned Centurion MK3 tank on which an athlete dressed in red, white and blue was jogging on a running machine attached to the tank’s massive caterpillar tracks, making them move and creating a din you could hear all over the public gardens. Inside the pavilion, Olympic gymnasts performed specially commissioned routines on scale model replicas of business class airline seats, contrasting the vibrancy and beauty of the human body in movement with the immobility and inertia of corporate and military thinking.
So how is it different from the angsty and non-scanning poetry written in secret diaries by emo 14 year-olds the world over?

In any case, it's bullshit. Corporate and military thinking moves at lightspeed compared to the self-regarding interia of the art world.

Quote:
Lord knows what it all meant – but who cares, it was great.
And that's art. Thank you and good night.
__________________
Standard disclaimer: the disgusting statements contained in this post are the views of the poster, and unless specified do not represent the views of the moderators or the site's owners.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 08-06-11, 05:45 PM
Gilles de Rais's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,639
Default

Originally Posted by contracycle View Post
No you couldn't. Seems to me your position amounts to saying "I can't be bothered to understand this so I'll just mock it". Which is really reminiscent of the sixth form?
That assumes as a matter of fact that there is something worth understanding there. In the case of most art-as-political-expression, especially of the modern-but-mainstram variety, I really really doubt it.

I mean, even stuff I quite like, like these anti-war graffitis by whoever, are making an exceedingly simplistic point.

Yeah, war is bad. Even GWB would agree with that. It's just that he thought his wars were different...
__________________
Unless otherwise specified, I am posting as a regular poster. When I will act as a mod, I'll make sure you're in no doubt.
Reply With Quote
Reply


(View-All Members who have read this thread : 3
contracycle, Gilles de Rais, Zichao
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0